The Truth in Pictures: Disasters in the Digital Age

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


For two days Hurricane Irene pounded the coast of the Eastern United States. Though she was ultimately downgraded to a tropical storm, the damage from flooding and downed branches left no doubt as to the power she commanded: washed out roads and rail lines, flooded homes, and widespread power failures left millions trying to pick up the pieces.

Not surprisingly, New Yorkers were skeptical of Irene's impact ahead of her arrival. (Perhaps a hurricane following an earthquake seemed a bit much to believe.) However, repeated warnings from City officials and preemptive planning to minimize potential damage, convinced many to reconsider. Two days before Hurricane Irene was to make landfall in New York, over four million visitors to 311 Online—New York City's information portal—brought the site down. It seems New Yorkers were finally paying attention.

In an effort to continue to provide New Yorkers with up-to-date information, City agencies turned to digital means. The Office of Emergency Management sent out regular email updates including attachments with emergency preparation and evacuation information. Rachel Sterne, New York City's Chief Digital Officer, as well as different City agencies began to use Twitter to broadcast emergency information. And Mayor Bloomberg's press conferences were streamed live. It was a well-coordinated attempt to reach citizens who were plugged in.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But some of the more serious messages about the severity of the storm came in the form of pictures from the MTA's Flickr stream, documenting first the preparations underway to shut down and protect transportation systems and then the devastation left in Irene's wake. It's true after all that a picture is worth a thousand words:

 

The images present a nice complement to the announcements being made by City officials, giving the public a view of the practical aspects of preparation. And perhaps for some, seeing the realities of these efforts helped fuel a sense of urgency beyond stocking the liquor cabinet.

Following Irene, given the uneven impact the storm left in its wake, the images reminded demonstrated just what workers were facing as a part of the clean-up efforts:

Whether this was a strategic effort on the part of the MTA or a byproduct of their own systematic documentation, these images contributed to the perceptions of City responsiveness to the situation and likely helped craft the public response during and following Irene. Links to individual photos were tweeted from @MTAInsider, and quickly spread on the social media circuit, creating a human link to what is otherwise a largely faceless bureaucratic entity. They create a chain of accountability. As the digital city emerges, efforts like this to connect with the public will prove increasingly important, and represent a growing understanding concerning the requirements for transparency in the digital age.

 

Photo credits: Lead image - NASA | All others - MTAPhoto.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe