My First Radiolab Interview: From Tree to Shining Tree

What goes on under the forest floor may astound you

 

 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Waaaay back last January I got an email from Robert Krulwich: would I be interested in doing an interview for Radiolab about mycorrhizae? Heck yeah! I’d written about this topic prior to the show several times here at Scientific American, notably “Dying Trees Can Send Food to Neighbors of Different Species”, “Root Fungi Can Turn Pine Trees Into Carnivores – Or at Least Accomplices”, and “The World’s Largest Mining Operation is Run by Fungi”.

Nearly seven months later, my interview has finally made it to the podcast. That sort of development time is not unusual for magazine-length articles, but I had still sort of despaired that it was ever going to happen. But it did! And it’s great! Have a listen (Warning: explicit language, but not by me):


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


You always worry when you go on TV or the radio that you will end up sounding like an idiot or make some sort of huge blunder. Now that I’ve finally listened to it, I don’t think I sound like an idiot (whew!), and I didn’t make any huge blunders, but as I listened today, I realized that I did make two mistakes worth noting.

First, I called springtails insects. Although they used to be considered insects, springtails are now classified as a sister group to the insects and are technically “hexapods” or “arthropods” depending on what level of classification you’d like to use.

Second, I made an error regarding the results of one of the springtail studies. I said that “25% of [springtail nitrogen] ended up in the trees”. In reality, what the scientists found that about 25% of the trees’ nitrogen had come from springtails. Oops. Sorry! It’s hard to remember everything perfectly when you’re under the gun in a studio on the line with the boys at Radiolab.

In any case, it was a fun, if nerve-wracking and intense experience (I made detailed notes and studied for several days before the interview to make sure I was up-to-snuff on all the research) and I’d totally do it again. It was definitely odd after all these years of listening to radiolab on my iPod while exercising to suddenly be the one on the show and reading the credits. But I think they did a fantastic job and I hope you enjoy it too!

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe