Nothing Here But a Hole in the Ocean . . .

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


If you live in the upper ocean, it pays to be transparent to avoid the gaze of Things Bigger and Hungrier Than You, since sunlight will pass right through. But if you live deep in the ocean, where predators often come equipped standard with searchlights, being transparent means lighting up like a Christmas tree under their voracious gaze. Glassy transparency scatters, refracts, and reflects their blue high beams. Far better to be a light-absorbing red or black.

But what if you live somewhere between, in a zone where, dependent on the weather, the time of day, or the soupiness of the water, you may be better off being transparent or colored? Well, if you're an octopus or squid, the shape and color shifters of the aquatic world, this is one solution:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=f0-_tSgtQsA


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


These octopuses are expanding and contracting pigmented chromatophores to produce the effect. According to new research in Current Biology by scientists at Duke University, the octopus Japatella heathi and squid Onychoteuthis banksii will produce the effect when a blue light is shined on them or they're physically touched, but not when an object passes in front of or overhead of the animal. The scientists could see that the octopus could see the objects (and were not amused), however, because they followed them with their eyes.

They also used spectrophotometers and probes to test reflectance; they found that octopuses with chromatophores deployed reflected half as much light as in transparent mode, and similar amounts of light to other deep sea fish and invertebrates.

This species shows a depth preference change as they age; the young prefer shallower, daylight waters, and adults prefer deeper, darker waters. So being able to shift between evasive strategies would make a lot of sense for these creatures. Furthermore, most deep sea predators have blue light searchlights. When the scientists tested these octopus with red light, they got no reaction either. I think there's a joke about a Red Light District wandering around here somewhere . . .

In any case, whether your own chromatophores were deployed or contracted this past year, or a mixture of both, I wish you a sunny, tranquil 2012. Happy New Year!

Zylinski, S., & Johnsen, S. (2011). Mesopelagic Cephalopods Switch between Transparency and Pigmentation to Optimize Camouflage in the Deep Current Biology, 21 (22), 1937-1941 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.014

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe