Nothing Here But a Hole in the Ocean . . .

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


If you live in the upper ocean, it pays to be transparent to avoid the gaze of Things Bigger and Hungrier Than You, since sunlight will pass right through. But if you live deep in the ocean, where predators often come equipped standard with searchlights, being transparent means lighting up like a Christmas tree under their voracious gaze. Glassy transparency scatters, refracts, and reflects their blue high beams. Far better to be a light-absorbing red or black.

But what if you live somewhere between, in a zone where, dependent on the weather, the time of day, or the soupiness of the water, you may be better off being transparent or colored? Well, if you're an octopus or squid, the shape and color shifters of the aquatic world, this is one solution:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=f0-_tSgtQsA


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


These octopuses are expanding and contracting pigmented chromatophores to produce the effect. According to new research in Current Biology by scientists at Duke University, the octopus Japatella heathi and squid Onychoteuthis banksii will produce the effect when a blue light is shined on them or they're physically touched, but not when an object passes in front of or overhead of the animal. The scientists could see that the octopus could see the objects (and were not amused), however, because they followed them with their eyes.

They also used spectrophotometers and probes to test reflectance; they found that octopuses with chromatophores deployed reflected half as much light as in transparent mode, and similar amounts of light to other deep sea fish and invertebrates.

This species shows a depth preference change as they age; the young prefer shallower, daylight waters, and adults prefer deeper, darker waters. So being able to shift between evasive strategies would make a lot of sense for these creatures. Furthermore, most deep sea predators have blue light searchlights. When the scientists tested these octopus with red light, they got no reaction either. I think there's a joke about a Red Light District wandering around here somewhere . . .

In any case, whether your own chromatophores were deployed or contracted this past year, or a mixture of both, I wish you a sunny, tranquil 2012. Happy New Year!

Zylinski, S., & Johnsen, S. (2011). Mesopelagic Cephalopods Switch between Transparency and Pigmentation to Optimize Camouflage in the Deep Current Biology, 21 (22), 1937-1941 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.014

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe