Pirates, Charles Darwin, and One Very Un-Extinct Dodo

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


"Dodo Birds". Black and amber chalk on cream paper. By Roelandt Savery, ca. 1626. Public Domain; click for source

Any animated film starring pirates, Charles Darwin, and a dodo is going to be worthy of mention here, but Aardman Animations -- of Wallace & Gromit and Chicken Run fame -- has outdone itself with "The Pirates!: Band of Misfits". I missed its theatrical run. But I happened to catch it recently and I think it's well worth your time, especially if, like me, you enjoy witty, screwball comedies.

Here's a taste:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As soon as I saw her, it was obvious the pirates' "parrot" Polly was a dodo. Which was a bit unexpected, considering the film also features Charles Darwin and Queen Victoria. By that time, dodos had been dead as ... well, dodos for well over 100 years. This goes on to become a major plot point in the film.

Dodos were giant flightless pigeons endemic to the Indian Ocean island of Mauritius, east of the coast of Madagascar. The species went extinct sometime in the late 1600s, barely 100 years after their discovery by Portuguese sailors. Although hungry Dutch traders and other seamen have historically been blamed for the loss by eating the naive birds, feral introduced animals like pigs may have been the larger force. Regardless, the world is poorer for it. At least for two hours, I got to pretend there was at least one left, which was fun. One quibble: actual dodos reached about 3 feet high and weighed at least 20 pounds -- possibly as much as 40. The bird in the film seems to be adorably chicken-sized.

This movie was based on the first book a series called "The Pirates! In An Adventure with Scientists". That was also the film's title in the United Kingdom. Strangely, the subtitle was changed to "Band of Misfits" in America, Australia, and New Zealand. Hypotheses abound on the reason, including US audiences' presumed distaste for science and certain Americans' known distaste for Charles Darwin.

Certainly, it's not the first time a UK title has been changed to make it more palatable or "understandable" to Americans ("Sorcerer's" Stone, anyone?). And don't get me started on the shamefulness of replacing Sir David Attenborough's timeless narration and script with a dumbed-down Oprah version, as was done to the US version of "Life". Still, considering they didn't change the content, if a new subtitle got more American backsides into "Pirates" movie theater seats, I can't object too much.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe