Spiny Baby Sea Bass Illustrates Surprising Physiques of Young Fish

Among divers and marine biologists, it’s common knowledge that ocean fish lead double lives. Like birds and butterflies, their young often look nothing like the adults, but unlike birds and butterflies, it is the young that are often more beautiful and ornate than their parents.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Among divers and marine biologists, it's common knowledge that ocean fish lead double lives. Like birds and butterflies, their young often look nothing like the adults, but unlike birds and butterflies, it is the young that are often more beautiful and ornate than their parents. I think this bit of natural history remains largely unknown to the wider world, though.

For instance, here is the larva (for so profoundly different are baby fish, they are given this name) of a previously undescribed species of sea bass. Sadly, it does not appear to have frickin' laserbeams or an ill temper, although it does have seven long spines, the first of which is a kind of frilly:

Cedric Guigand, University of Miami. Fig. 1a from Baldwin and Johnson 2014. Click image for source.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A photograph of this fish appeared without identification as a "decoration" in a paper on the ecology of marine fish. Smithsonian zoologist Carole Baldwin and curator Dave Johnson could see it was a sea bass larva but didn't recognize the species, and were struck by those seven spines. Almost every larva in this family bears only two spines. That piqued their interest, so they set out to see if they could identify the adult. When the DNA barcode of the larva -- a special section of DNA in the fish's mitochondria that's considered a particularly good indicator of species -- was sequenced, the little fish failed to match any known species.

The solution appeared when Smithsonian scientists separately exploring deep reef off the Caribbean island of Curaçao in a privately owned manned submarine (called, of course, the Curasub) collected some "golden basses" 300 m down (1,000 feet). After a spin through the sequencer, the scientists discovered that hiding among a species of golden bass called Liopropoma aberrans was a cryptic species -- one that physically looks so similar to another they are difficult to distinguish by eye -- that matched the DNA of their little mystery larva. And voilà! A new species was named: Liopropoma olneyi.

When the little be-spined fish grows up, it turned out, it looks like this:

Adult L. olneyi. Image by Barry Brown, Substation Curacao. Click image for source.

Or sometimes like this:

Adult L. olneyi. Photo by Ross Robertson and Carole Baldwin. Fig. 4 from Baldwin and Johnson 2014. Click image for source.

But if you think this metamorphosis is dramatic, the paper included two even more stunning examples.

Here are the adults of Liopropoma carmabi at top, and L. rubre at botttom,

Excerpt from Fig. 3 from Baldwin and Johnson 2014. Click image for source.

... and here are their larvae. L. rubre at left, L. carmabi at right.

Fig. 1B and C from Baldwin and Johnson 2014. Click image for source.

Here's a closeup of that first number. Note the iridescent green flecks in the bands on the banner.

Fig. 1B from Baldwin and Johnson 2014. Click image for source.

With these pictures, you can appreciate how extraordinarily hard it was to link larval fish to adults prior to the advent of DNA sequencing technology. Even with the ability to peek at their DNA, you must sometimes still open your eyes and get a little bit lucky to make a match. In fact, even with DNA barcoding, the Smithsonian scientists write, "... species identifications of larvae of most marine fishes remain elusive." Which is kind of mind-blowing, when you think about it. Because it means for most of the fish in the ocean, we still don't know what their young look like. We're not talking about microbes or copepods here. We're talking about the largest, most conspicuous, and "charismatic" creatures in the ocean.

These are but a few examples. But by now you may be wondering: why? Why do baby fish look like members of a different species?

Location, location, location. The habitat these fish swim in as adults is very different from the habitat they occupy as larvae. The larval stage of many ocean fish involves drifting at or near the ocean surface. But as adults, they live somewhere else -- a shallow or deep coral reef, perhaps, or the open ocean, or the ocean deep. Why these larval fish have these ornate streamers in particular I do not know for certain, although I can speculate that they may make them look more like a piece of flotsam, a jellyfish or seaweed than a tasty fish dinner.

In short, shapeshifting enables marine fish to adapt to both environments they live in, although it means that to our eyes, they appear to be two entirely different fish. In a way, they are.

Reference

Baldwin C.C. & Johnson G.D. (2014). Connectivity across the Caribbean Sea: DNA Barcoding and Morphology Unite an Enigmatic Fish Larva from the Florida Straits with a New Species of Sea Bass from Deep Reefs off Curaçao., PloS one, PMID: 24825118

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe