A Modest Proposal: 3-D Printing of Fossils Still Trapped in Matrix, redux

In the series “A Modest Proposal,” my colleagues and I will propose inventions and projects that I think are eminently doable and would love made real.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In the series "A Modest Proposal," my colleagues and I will propose inventions and projects that I think are eminently doable and would love made real.

I had suggested last year that one could create 3-D scans of fossils while they are still trapped within the rock using, say, X-rays. Imagine 3-D models of all these vast libraries of fossils placed online where students in schools all around the world might take a look at them either on their computers or by using 3-D printers to manufacture replicas and maybe even dinosaur robots.

Now German scientists have used CT scans with 3-D printers to make accurate copies of a dinosaur vertebra still embedded in rock and plaster, research appearing in the journal Radiology. The fossil was originally buried under rubble in the basement of a museum in Berlin after a World War II bombing raid.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


However, these researchers are far from the first to CT scan fossils and 3-D print replicas of the bones. Vertebrate paleontologist Michael Polcyn at Southern Methodist University in Dallas tells me this has been done for years.

For instance, below are fossil bird bones that paleontologist Brett Nachman of the University of Texas at Austin printed for a colleague, all scanned while still within the matrix that held them.

And here are 3-D replicas of juvenile fossil primate jaws with teeth, printed by Eric Delson at the City University of New York's Lehman College, alongside the original fossil.

And here is a reconstruction of an ancient mollusk known as a multiplacophoran that lived about 390 million years ago, a multicolored, textured model in clay, resin and silicone based off a micro-CT scan:

To derive a good 3-D model, Polcyn notes there needs to be reasonable contrast between the rock and the fossil, "and this is not always the case." The cost of CT scanning and the data-processing needed to derive a 3-D model good enough for printing may also exceed the cost of traditional fossil preparation.

In addition, the resolution of scans typically decreases as the size of specimens increases "both due to the size of the machine that can accommodate the fossil and the practical computing and memory limitations encountered when processing the huge data sets," Polcyn said. "In the case of very large fossils, there are only a few CT scanners that can be used, and these are generally designed for use by the aerospace industry for scanning aircraft components."

You can email me regarding A Modest Proposal attoohardforscience@gmail.comand follow the series on Twitter at #modestproposal.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe