Meta-Post: Posts on Cancer

Cross-Check columns on cancer and related topics

Skin cancer cells.

Steve Gschmeissner Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Below are columns I’ve written on cancer and related topics. Please let me know about missing stories, broken links or other problems. – John Horgan

Cancer Medicine Is Failing Us

Sorry, But So Far War on Cancer Has Been a Bust


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cancer Establishment Admits We’re Getting Overtested and Overtreated

Why I Won't Get a PSA Test for Prostate Cancer

Why I Won't Get a Colonoscopy

Why We Overrate Life-saving Power of Cancer Tests

Cancer Spending Higher in U.S. Than in Europe--and So Is Cancer Mortality

Do Mammograms Kill More Women Than They Save?

Questioning Mammograms Versus "Torturing the Data"

Consumers Must Stop Insisting on Mammograms and Other Ineffective Cancer Tests

ABC Reporter, National Football League Promote Mammograms While Experts Question Benefits

Celebrities Should Inform Women about Risks as Well as Benefits of Mammograms.

When Mammograms Are Mandatory

RELATED TOPICS

Is Medicine Overrated?

Dear "Skeptics," Bash Homeopathy and Bigfoot Less, Mammograms and War More

How Can We Curb the Medical-Testing Epidemic?

Maybe Now Americans Will Finally Get Affordable Care!

Bayes's Theorem: What's the Big Deal?

So Far, Big Data Is Small Potatoes

Is Science Hitting a Wall?, Part 1

Is Science Hitting a Wall? Part 2

Has the Era of Gene Therapy Finally Arrived?

RELATED META-POSTS

Meta-Post: Posts on Brain Implants

Meta-Post: Posts on Mental Illness

Meta-Post: Posts on Buddhism and Meditation

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe