Why You Should Be Excited about This Week's Big LIGO Announcement

It could mark the birth of a new kind of astronomy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


They’ve called not one press conference but three of them, at least. Simultaneous events are now scheduled for Thursday in Washington, D.C., London, and Paris, and it seems like more are being announced every hour. We can assume the scientists of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) have something important to tell us.*

As you've probably heard, rumor is that LIGO has detected gravitational waves, possibly ones caused by the merger of two stellar-mass black holes. (The merger of two neutron stars or a particularly violent supernova could also send ripples through spacetime that LIGO could detect.) Kip Thorne, Caltech general-relativity guru and arguably LIGO’s most prominent supporter, has explained many times over the years why a discovery like this would be exciting, but the line of his I like best comes from 300 Years of Gravitation (1987): “If cosmic gravitational waves can be detected and studied, they will create a revolution of our view of the universe comparable to or greater than that which resulted from the discovery of radio waves.”

I like that line because it’s the opposite of cautious academic equivocating—and yet it’s published in a scholarly volume of essays by giants like Stephen Hawking, Roger Blandford, Roger Penrose, and Martin Rees. In a venue discouraging of hype, Thorne predicted that gravitational waves would transform our understanding of nature. This press conference on Thursday might be kind of a big deal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The opening of the radio sky, of course, led to the discovery of radio galaxies, quasars, and astrophysical black holes. The detection of gravitational waves could be similarly transformative because it would mark the beginning of an era in which scientists can use gravitational waves just as they use electromagnetic radiation—as a means of observing the cosmos.

Naturally, I’m particularly interested in what this could mean for the study of black holes. The next few years already look incredibly promising; as early as next spring, the Event Horizon Telescope should start looking for the “shadow” of the black hole at the center of the Milky Way, meaning we might soon see, with actual pictures, the faces of these things. Adding gravitational-wave detectors to the toolbox is like growing a new sense organ. We’ll find out Thursday whether this organ has heard anything yet.

*Although wouldn’t it be funny if the press conference turned out to be a routine update?

Seth Fletcher is director of editorial content at Scientific American. His book Einstein's Shadow (Ecco, 2018), on the Event Horizon Telescope and the quest to take the first picture of a black hole, was excerpted in the New York Times Magazine and named a New York Times Book Review Editor’s Choice. His book Bottled Lightning (2011) was the first definitive account of the invention of the lithium-ion battery and the 21st-century rebirth of the electric car. His writing has appeared in the New York Times Magazine, the New York Times op-ed page, Popular Science, Fortune, Men's Journal, Outside and other publications. His television and radio appearances have included CBS’s Face the Nation, NPR’s Fresh Air, the BBC World Service, and NPR’s Morning Edition, Science Friday, Marketplace and The Takeaway. He has a master’s degree from the Missouri School of Journalism and a bachelor’s degrees in English and philosophy from the University of Missouri.

More by Seth Fletcher

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe