Why You Should Be Excited about This Week's Big LIGO Announcement

It could mark the birth of a new kind of astronomy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


They’ve called not one press conference but three of them, at least. Simultaneous events are now scheduled for Thursday in Washington, D.C., London, and Paris, and it seems like more are being announced every hour. We can assume the scientists of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) have something important to tell us.*

As you've probably heard, rumor is that LIGO has detected gravitational waves, possibly ones caused by the merger of two stellar-mass black holes. (The merger of two neutron stars or a particularly violent supernova could also send ripples through spacetime that LIGO could detect.) Kip Thorne, Caltech general-relativity guru and arguably LIGO’s most prominent supporter, has explained many times over the years why a discovery like this would be exciting, but the line of his I like best comes from 300 Years of Gravitation (1987): “If cosmic gravitational waves can be detected and studied, they will create a revolution of our view of the universe comparable to or greater than that which resulted from the discovery of radio waves.”

I like that line because it’s the opposite of cautious academic equivocating—and yet it’s published in a scholarly volume of essays by giants like Stephen Hawking, Roger Blandford, Roger Penrose, and Martin Rees. In a venue discouraging of hype, Thorne predicted that gravitational waves would transform our understanding of nature. This press conference on Thursday might be kind of a big deal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The opening of the radio sky, of course, led to the discovery of radio galaxies, quasars, and astrophysical black holes. The detection of gravitational waves could be similarly transformative because it would mark the beginning of an era in which scientists can use gravitational waves just as they use electromagnetic radiation—as a means of observing the cosmos.

Naturally, I’m particularly interested in what this could mean for the study of black holes. The next few years already look incredibly promising; as early as next spring, the Event Horizon Telescope should start looking for the “shadow” of the black hole at the center of the Milky Way, meaning we might soon see, with actual pictures, the faces of these things. Adding gravitational-wave detectors to the toolbox is like growing a new sense organ. We’ll find out Thursday whether this organ has heard anything yet.

*Although wouldn’t it be funny if the press conference turned out to be a routine update?

Seth Fletcher is director of editorial content at Scientific American. His book Einstein's Shadow (Ecco, 2018), on the Event Horizon Telescope and the quest to take the first picture of a black hole, was excerpted in the New York Times Magazine and named a New York Times Book Review Editor’s Choice. His book Bottled Lightning (2011) was the first definitive account of the invention of the lithium-ion battery and the 21st-century rebirth of the electric car. His writing has appeared in the New York Times Magazine, the New York Times op-ed page, Popular Science, Fortune, Men's Journal, Outside and other publications. His television and radio appearances have included CBS’s Face the Nation, NPR’s Fresh Air, the BBC World Service, and NPR’s Morning Edition, Science Friday, Marketplace and The Takeaway. He has a master’s degree from the Missouri School of Journalism and a bachelor’s degrees in English and philosophy from the University of Missouri.

More by Seth Fletcher

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe