MIT Neurotech: From Signals to Behavior

You're sitting outside posting pics of a beautiful day to Facebook when the smell hits you. A spicy, cheesy, carne asada-ey deliciousness that can only mean one thing: a burrito truck is near.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


You’re sitting outside posting pics of a beautiful day to Facebook when the smell hits you. A spicy, cheesy, carne asada-ey deliciousness that can only mean one thing: a burrito truck is near. Hound-like, you hunt your lunch. An impending Mexicali meal will soon satiate your suddenly growling stomach. You finally arrive, brave a bending line, order and exchange a five-dollar bill for possibly the best burrito of your life. But what if when you reached the front of the line, you had only a credit card and the cash-only food truck had turned you away? One step awry in this situation and you would have had to live your afternoon burrito-less, grumpy and hungry.

Neuroscientists often ponder similar questions. Not about burritos, but rather how alterations in sequences of action potentials can lead to variations in outcomes. How does cellular activity allow a brain to make decisions or formulate what to do next? How does what you think relate to what you do?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A neuron spikes, sending an action potential along its axon to be received by dendrites of other cells found downstream in its signal pathway. Charting these pathways allows us to decipher causational information flow in the brain, which can be useful if we want to understand the neurological basis of things like memory formation or intelligence.

As if it is not complicated enough, a brain is no uniform single organ. Within are many substructures. The hippocampus, for example, plays a primary role in memory formation and the thalamus helps the brain process a multitude of sensory information. Each structure has its own role in a brain’s overall function. They are differentiated in part by unique arrangements and functional activity of cell types that project to and receive spikes from other parts of the brain. We recognize that these pathways are core to neurological function; however, little is known of their detailed compositions.

In part because neurons are tiny — hundreds of them would fit across the tip of a single human hair. This makes them challenging to see and measure. That’s where neurotech comes in. Microelectrode recording devices allow researchers to monitor activity of hundreds of neurons at single cell resolution in different parts of the brain during behavior.

Behavior includes things we may not think about, like sleep. During the night, a brain replays the day’s memories, consolidating a few of them into the mind’s long-term archives. During subsequent days, weeks and even years, the brain can alter those memories. Research indicates that memory modifications occur at cellular precision deep within the brain, which means that scaled single neuron resolution monitoring stands to illuminate the mechanisms of retaining and maintaining knowledge.

Brains do much more than think. Walking or holding a phone is something most of us do every day and take for granted. But one severed step in a neural pathway can be enough to prohibit its function. Take the case of Ian Burkhart. In 2010 he broke his neck. At 23 years old, he is quadriplegic – for now. Researchers at Ohio State University successfully implanted a neuroprosthetic microelectrode into Ian’s brain, letting him move his arm by thinking. How long will it be before neurotech allows paraplegics to walk again?

Tune in to next week’s MIT Neurotech as we explore how microfluidics shines light on the molecular basis of cancer.

Editor’s note: This is the third installment in a series about emerging neurotechnologies. Join a pilot class of 12 PhD students at MIT as we explore how neuroscience is revolutionizing our understanding of the brain. Each post coincides with a lecture and lab tour at MIT created by the Center for Neurobiological Engineering. This experiment is supported by MITx and created by EyeWire.

Amy Robinson is the Creative Director of EyeWire, a game to map the brain from MIT and Princeton. EyeWire is played by 150,000 people worldwide. Together, gamers are helping us decipher the mysteries of how we see. Amy is a long time TEDster and founded the TEDx Music Project, a collection of the best live music from TEDx events around the world.

More by Amy Robinson

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe