North Pond: Tick Tock

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Follow Dr. Katrina Edwards, as she explores the microbial life at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean

The calm before the storm is definitely over. I’m anxious to begin and nervous about leaving. I’m positive I’m forgetting a million important items. Meanwhile there is still teaching and running a lab and a home to contend with …. normal life for less than one more week.

Thought I’d take a few more minutes to tell you about what is really the hallmark feature of this project: our engineering and CORK operations that I mentioned in an earlier post. These are essentially seals that we put at the top of a cored hole that allows the nature thermal, hydrological, and hopefully biological systems to return to “normal” after the drilling disturbance.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


See, drilling always disturbs the natural conditions – cutting through rock with a rotary drill bit that has to be lubricated by pumping surface seawater into the bore kind of mucks things up for awhile.

But we are patient scientists, and willing to invest the time and infrastructure to enable the system to re-establish to its natural state, in order to have the opportunity to study geological, hydrological, geophysical, and — of course — biological processes in-situ.

So we will plug up those holes, instrument them with our experiments and novel tools. And then wait and watch. For probably the next four to ten years!

You might begin to get a feeling for the scale of these programs – both size and length of planning and experimentation. We consider these observatory programs to be very akin to the planning, operations, and engineering that is involved in space exploration. These big programs are essentially our “Apollo Missions” to the innerspace of Earth to study the deepest and darkest ecosystems that exist within our planet.

We *hope* to set up three CORKed observatories in the very middle of the Atlantic Ocean. I say “hope” because like missions into outer space, missions into inner space are fraught with major hurdles and some objectives may not be met because of them. But we are optimistic … it is impossible to be anything else!

Katrina Edwards is a geomicrobiologist who studies the microbiology of hydrothermal sulfides and the igneous ocean crust. She has particular fascination with one common, yet elusive microbial group associated with these deep habitats, the iron oxidizing bacteria. These are the bacteria that make rust. She received her Ph.D. in geomicrobiology from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, in 1999 and spent the following 7 years as a researcher at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Massachusetts, USA. This is where she "sunk to the bottom of the ocean" and never came back up. She is now a Professor of Biology and Earth Sciences at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, and is the Director of the Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI), an NSF sponsored program created at USC expressly for the study of the deep marine biosphere. Katrina has a husband and three children waiting at home for her during this long expedition.

More by Katrina Edwards

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe