Squid "jigging" brings elusive cephalopods up from Sea of Cortez

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Editor's Note: William Gilly, a professor of cell and developmental biology and marine and organismal biology at Stanford University, is traveling with a group of students on board the Don José in the Sea of Cortez. They will monitor and track Humboldt squid and sperm whales in their watery habitats. This is the group's third blog post.

SEA OF CORTEZ—And the race is on! Three—no, four—fishing lines snake down into the deep, with more folks using hand lines. Feeding about 20 or 30 feet of fishing line into the water (just to the point where the glow-in-the-dark lure is no longer visible from the surface), scientists, students and crew alike jig for all they are worth, moving the line up and down in the water column—a foot or so up, a foot or so down. Jigging. Curious, the swarm of small Humboldt squid come over for a look and a cursory nibble.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After four squidless and squid-poor days, squid a-plenty is most welcome. Our crew was getting anxious; we had seen the sperm whales, which commonly eat squid, so we knew we were getting close. We had also seen myctophids, which often turn up in squid stomachs, but the link on the food chain between the three had been missing. We have finally caught up to our elusive prey.

Pull! Pull! The spools on the reels spin furiously until a snagged squid breaks the surface. The chromatophores expand and contract, causing the skin to change from white to red and back again while the squid issues a strong burst of water from its siphon as it comes over the side. Students hurry to and fro, sorting squid for respiratory experiments, removing the stomach and liver for content analysis, and then setting aside the edible portions for a cooking project. Each must be weighed, the circumference and length of the mantle measured, the sex recorded. Near midnight, we pull out a prize from deeper water: a 74-centimeter-long squid, the length of the tube or mantle! This raises a question: Why are the majority of the squid so small (only 16-29 centimeters) when usually they are all giants like our 74-centimeter sample? After examining the guts, students conclude that the miniature squid were sexually mature and unlikely to grow bigger. Could size have to do with the conditions in the water? Hopefully our oxygen, salinity and temperature measurements with the CTD will yield some answers about the mystery of the small squid size.

Other analysis will have to wait until we can get our hands dirty in the lab and utilize high-powered microscopes for stomach-contents data, using a more stable base (nothing gets you seasick like looking through a microscope in a swell; we thought it best not to examine the contents of our own stomachs). However, we are able to expose the contents of two squid stomachs to find fish bones, small squid beaks and even a crustacean, supporting a more complex food chain in the Sea of Cortez.

Image of 74-cm mature Humboldt squid courtesy of Susan Shillinglaw; image of female sperm whale and calf in Farallon Basin courtesy of Susan Shillinglaw; image of 26-cm mature Humboldt squid (not typical of Sea of Cortez) courtesy of Susan Shillinglaw.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe