Chinese Sturgeon Give Up, Stop Breeding in Polluted Yangtze River

When an endangered species stops breeding, you know its days are probably numbered. In China the countdown has apparently begun for the critically endangered Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis).

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


When an endangered species stops breeding, you know its days are probably numbered. In China the countdown has apparently begun for the critically endangered Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis). According to a report issued this week by the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, only about 100 of the massive fish remain in the heavily polluted and dammed Yangtze River. Even worse, the academy found that the sturgeon did not reproduce naturally at all in 2013. Researchers found no evidence of either eggs or juveniles.

As a result of this lack of reproduction, researchers say the species is now at risk of extinction in the wild.

That's quite a change from just 50 or 60 years ago, when a healthy sturgeon fishing industry existed on the Yangtze and nearby rivers. But pollution and the construction of dams took a rapid toll. By the late 1970s, the sturgeon population had dropped to an estimated 10,000 adults. The 1980s saw another drop as the Gezhouba Dam cut off the upper Yangtze and blocked the sturgeons' migratory route. By 1984, the population of spawning adult sturgeon had fallen to under 2,200.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


China did try to stop this decline by legally protecting the sturgeon and supplementing the wild population with millions of captive-raised juveniles and even recently hatched larvae. This practice continued for decades but the effort appears to have been for naught. Research published in 2009 indicated that the Yangtze's polluted waterways were contributing to sturgeon malformations, deformed larvae and a reduced egg quantity. In addition, because the Yangtze is heavily trafficked by boats and fishing vessels many of the fish have died from propeller strikes or in fishermen's nets.

The Chinese sturgeon species appears to have existed nearly unchanged for 140 million years. Although it will almost certainly persist in captivity, it seems likely that this will be its last century in the wild.

Previously in Extinction Countdown:

Photo: Shankar S. via Flickr. Used under Creative Commons license

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe