First Major Genetic Study of Elusive South African Dolphin Reveals a Species in Peril

In 1828, in a short paper in the journal Spicilegia Zoologica, British zoologist John Edward Gray reported six “new and undescribed” marine animals, among them a small dolphin found off southern Africa’s Atlantic coast.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In 1828, in a short paper in the journal Spicilegia Zoologica, British zoologist John Edward Gray reported six "new and undescribed" marine animals, among them a small dolphin found off southern Africa's Atlantic coast. The specimen had been brought to him by Thomas Haviside, a captain for the East India Company, who encountered the dolphin off the coast of Namibia. Gray dubbed the species Haviside's dolphin.

Unfortunately, Gray and those who followed him made a slight mistake in describing this species. They confused Capt. Haviside with the similarly named Capt. Heaviside, a British surgeon who collected cetacean species. The name Heaviside's dolphin (Cephalorhynchus heavisidii) has since stuck.

Precious few scientific studies of the Heaviside's dolphin have been published in the nearly 200 years since its first description. One paper in 1977 described its underwater sounds, a topic a few other studies have echoed. Another project in 2004 tracked six dolphins via satellite to learn about their range and movements. A 2006 study looked at genetic variation within the species, which suggested a high level of homogeneity within the dolphin's populations but made few conclusions. A 2008 study tried to estimate the population size for the species, but it suffered from a lack of data.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That was about it—until now. A new genetic study conducted by Keshni Gopal as part of her doctoral research at the University of Pretoria in South Africa has revealed some bad news for these poorly understood dolphins. They are all related and the removal of as few as 15 individuals per year from the total population could have dire consequences on future breeding and population size.

For her study, Gopal collected samples from 395 individual dolphins, a difficult task that took four hot summers. "Since these dolphins come inshore in the early hours of the morning, I had to be out at sea very early," she says. Over time she developed the coordination necessary to collect biopsy samples from the fast-moving dolphins with a pole-spear called a Hawaiian sling. "The dolphins sometimes made it extremely difficult for me to take a sample," she says. "When I was unsuccessful at taking a sample, they were more wary of me."

Once she finally had enough skin samples, Gopal tested them for molecular markers such as microsatellite loci, which are genes inherited from both parents. The results show that Heaviside's dolphins live in two major metapopulations that have little to no migration between them. The southern metapopulation, in South Africa's Table Bay and Saint Helena Bay, had the greatest level of relatedness. She was also able to identify six smaller subpopulations, which show signs of interbreeding but to a lesser degree.

Gopal says this genetic information is important because so little is known about the dolphins' social biology. In particular, scientists don't know how often they breed, which would be an indication of how quickly they could recover from population losses. The species faces a potential threat from the nearby hake fishing industry, which uses longlines and trawling nets that could entangle the dolphins. "The amount of Heaviside's dolphins and other marine mammals caught in these nets are unknown, as it has not been recorded," she says.

Gopal, who is currently taking time after graduation to travel and write up her research for publication, says she looks back on her Heaviside's dolphin research as an incredible experience. "It was amazing to be out at sea during that time, as I have seen many things—inquisitive southern right whales coming up to the boat, being surrounded by a school of common dolphins and dusky dolphins, moving through waters with millions of bell jellyfish and sunfish, and, when the water clarity was superb, looking down to the bottom of the inshore coastline." She also made connections with local recreational and subsistence fishermen who use small boats and dinghies to catch crayfish and who value the Heaviside's dolphins. They report back to her whenever new individuals are spotted.

Obviously there is still much to learn about the Heaviside's dolphin. Hopefully it won't take another few decades before that happens.

Photo: Jutta Luft via Wikipedia. Used under Creative Commons license

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe