Geese May Be Helping to Spread Frog-Killing Chytrid Fungus

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The frog-killing fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), which causes the disease chytridiomycosis, has been blamed for about 100 amphibian extinctions around the globe since it was first observed in 1998, but clear information on exactly how it spreads has remained a mystery.

Now a team of scientists working in Belgium have come up with one potential clue: the chytrid fungus may sometimes be carried to new habitats on the toes of waterfowl such as geese.

According to research published April 13 in the journal PLoS One, geese are "potential environmental reservoirs" for the Bd fungus, because waterfowl and amphibians often co-occur in the same habitats. The team studied 497 wild geese—which had been rounded up from six wildlife areas in East Flanders as part of an invasive species eradication program—and found that the keratinous toe scales of 76 of the birds tested positive for Bd. The fungus was present on both species of geese that they tested: invasive Canada geese (Branta Canadensis) and domesticated geese (Anser anser domesticus) that had been living in the wild.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers then took some toe scales, heated them in an autoclave, and exposed them to Bd zoospores, which over the course of the in vitro experiment both adhered to and proliferated on the toe cells. After four days, the fungus developed discharge tubes and released new zoospores, showing that the geese's toe scales provided not just a site for the fungus to reside but also to reproduce.

The team also incubated Bd zoospores on the surface of toe tissue from a dead whooper swan (Cygnus cygnus) and two dead Moscovy ducks (Cairina moschata) that had been brought to their facility for postmortem examination, with similar results.

Whereas Bd thrives in moist environments, the paper points out that it can survive a drying period of up to 30 minutes, during which time a goose could fly up to 30 kilometers—more than enough time for a bird to move from one pond to another.

The researchers did add two caveats: first, because the in vitro experiment used scales from destroyed birds that had been heated in an autoclave, the tissue may have been altered in the process, although they saw no specific macroscopic evidence of such. Second, they note that direct contact between amphibians and geese "might be rather limited."

Although this research does not prove avian-to-amphibian fungal transmission, it appears to be an important step into understanding the possible transmission paths of this deadly fungus.

Read my previous stories on the chytrid fungus here.

Photo 1: An invasive Canada goose in Belgium by Peter Van den Bossche. Photo 2: A dead frog infected with Bd by Brian Gratwicke. Used under Creative Commons license

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe