Invasive Goldenrod is Killing Europe's Ants and Butterflies

The North American plant may look pretty, but it’s also pretty deadly in places where it doesn’t belong

goldenrod

Photo: Peter O’Connor. Used under Creative Commons license

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Here in North America, the ubiquitous plants known as goldenrod (from the genus Solidago) play host to literally hundreds of insects, providing shelter or food to bees, butterflies, spiders, praying mantises and all kinds of other species.

In other parts of the world, however, the relationship is decidedly negative. Goldenrod—a remarkably adaptable group of plants—has taken over fields throughout Europe and Asia, putting native species at risk wherever they grow. Goldenrod can reach up to 2 meters in height, so they block the sun from reaching smaller plants. They are also prodigious reproducers, with each adult plant capable of releasing up to 10,000 tiny seeds which are easily dispersed by the wind. Finally, their roots also produce a group of chemicals that can inhibit the growth of other plants that surround them, a process called allelopathy. Those three factors alone have been enough to label goldenrod as some of the world’s worst invasive plants.

Now new research shows that the effect of goldenrod invasions is even more dangerous than we previously knew. According to a paper published Jan. 11 in the Journal of Insect Conservation, invasive goldenrod in Europe are also killing off native ant and butterfly species.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers from Poland’s Jagiellonian University discovered this insect decline by examining ten semi-natural grasslands located southeast of Krakow. Five of those meadows, the authors wrote, have “a serious problem with uncontrolled spreading of goldenrod populations.” They looked at a total of 60 plots within those meadows and the insect compositions they contained.

More specifically, they looked at ants. The plots contained seven different ant species, the most common of which were from the genus Myrmica.

Photo: Gillies San Martin. Used under Creative Commons license

Well, they were the most common ants in the plots that didn’t contain goldenrod. In plots where the invasive plants were present, Myrmica populations were reduced by at least 50 percent and up to 81 percent. The most striking effect was on a species called M. scabrinodis, which the authors wrote should have adapted to the cool shade provided by goldenrod. Unfortunately goldenrod produces nectar later in the season than native plants, which apparently forces the ants to travel further and use more energy to search for food.

Why does that matter? For one thing, ants play a pretty important role in the ecosystem. As the authors wrote in their paper, ants in general consume 3 percent of a meadow’s biomass each season and in the process affect the chemical composition of the surrounding soil. Their corridors and nests also serve to make the soil more porous, enhance decomposition, and allow colonization of microbiota and fungi that plants need as parts of their diet.

More pressingly, the three Myrmica ant species also play an important part in the lifecycle of three threatened or endangered butterflies in the Phengaris genus, which lay their eggs in ant nests and often feed on the ants. Two of the three species fully depend on this parasitic relationship for their survival.

Photo: Dusky large blue butterfly (Phengaris nausithous) by David Short. Used under Creative Commons license

The authors say that a change in Phengaris butterflies has not yet been observed in the area of the study, but the goldenrod invasion is new enough that it could soon cause declines in at least two of the three species.

This might seem like a small-scale study, but it’s an important piece of the picture of Europe’s declining meadowlands. A paper published in 2014 estimated that Europe has lost as much as 80 percent of its ecologically important meadows over the past century due to development, mowing and cattle grazing.

The full effect of that meadow loss is still being determined, but the ants and the butterflies are just the beginning. Previous research has also linked goldenrod to other losses in biodiversity. The authors warn that serious attempts are necessary to stem the goldenrod invasion throughout Europe before the ecological damage can no longer be undone.

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe