Hungry Polar Bears Could Soon Start Devastating Bird Populations

A hungry polar bear (Ursus maritimus) will eat just about anything. Oh sure, they prefer to dine on nice fatty seals (I mean, what Arctic creature wouldn't?), but when push comes to shove they'll eat caribou, walruses, nuts, birds, and even stinky, rotten whale carcasses.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A hungry polar bear (Ursus maritimus) will eat just about anything. Oh sure, they prefer to dine on nice fatty seals (I mean, what Arctic creature wouldn’t?), but when push comes to shove they’ll eat caribou, walruses, nuts, birds, and even stinky, rotten whale carcasses.

Oh yeah, they’ll also eat eggs. Research over the past few years has documented polar bears increasingly munching on goose eggs, which are sometimes the only readily available source of nourishment when the ursines are stuck on land after their normal sea-ice habitats have melted (you know, from climate change).

Eggs are, of course, yummy but they come with an ecological cost. According to a paper published this week in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, polar bears in some areas are eating so many eggs that bird populations soon suffer.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The research—by a team of 16 international scientists—was conducted in east Greenland and the Norwegian island Spitsbergen, part of the Svalbard archipelago, between 2004 and 2014. At each of five sites studied, the sea ice season lasted fewer days each year. As a result, polar bears spent a lot more time on land: 15 percent more time each year of this century.

Unfortunately, the ice season also started earlier each year, by as much as 3 days in some sites. That gave polar bears access to the land at the same time as the key nesting seasons for several sea birds, including barnacle geese (Branta leucopsis), common eiders (Somateria mollissima) and glaucous gulls (Larus hyperboreus). Guess what happened next?

Yup, the hungry polar bears went to town on those nests. In the years when bears made landfall well before the eggs started hatching, they ate more than 90 percent of the eggs. That’s enough to have a potentially devastating effect on future populations.

None of those birds are endangered—they’re all classified as “least concern” on the IUCN Red List and each species nests in plenty of other sites. Still, this shift in bear eating patterns bodes poorly for the birds’ ability to nest in those traditional sites.

Obviously this is a somewhat limited study. These five sites weren’t exactly swarming with polar bears or birds, but the observations in this study match up with similar studies in Canada, where polar bears have also been observed eating goose eggs to replace unreachable seals. As Polar Bears International’s chief scientist, Steven Amstrup, told me a few years ago, “If the whole bear population was trying to survive on eggs, soon there would be no geese left.”

And if that backup source of food disappears, what happens to polar bears then?

Photo: Greenland Travel. Used under Creative Commons license

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe