Legacy of South Africa's First Female Botanist Reaffirmed after 147 Years

The critically endangered plant known as Mrs. Barber’s beauty eluded modern researchers for decades

Photo by Ralph Clark, used under Creative Commons license

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A rare South African flower first described by a pioneering feminist scientist in 1862 but unseen since then has finally been rediscovered.

Mary Elizabeth Barber, South Africa’s first woman ornithologist and botanist and a correspondent of Charles Darwin, described dozens of bird, plant and insect species over the course of her lifetime. More than a century after her death in 1899, several of those species still bear her name.

But one of the species she discovered, a plant called Mrs. Barber’s beauty (Lotononis harveyi), has remained a bit of a mystery. Although the samples she collected can still be examined in museums, the living flowers eluded rediscovery for decades.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Until now. The beautiful plant has finally been found once again and photographed for the very first time.

Vincent Ralph Clark of Rhodes University in South Africa actually first rediscovered Lotononis harveyi in 2009—147 years after Barber’s description was first published—while conducting field work in the Great Winterberg mountain range for his Ph.D. At the time, though, he didn’t realize exactly what he had seen. A sample he collected that year was reexamined in 2014 by University of Johannesburg botany professor Ben-Erik Van Wyk, who suggested the white flower with densely hairy petals could be the lost species.

With that encouraging revelation, Clark returned to the Winterbergs later that year and extended his search. He not only found the plant he saw in 2009 but also located several others. The confirmed rediscovery was finally published this month in the journal PhytoKeys..

What Clark also confirmed is that Mrs. Barber’s beauty probably eluded rediscovery not just because of its remote location but also its slow growth rate and rarity. He found just six specimens, two of which had damaged stems, and no evidence of recruitment of the next generation of plants. This, along with potential threats from fire and livestock, led him to suggest that the flower should be considered critically endangered.

There could be more than just those six plants out there, of course, as the steep mountain does a pretty good job of keeping its secrets. Additional expeditions would be required to find them, as well as to learn more about the elusive Mrs. Barber’s beauty. The paper notes that we know “virtually nothing about its biology.” That means that although this rare flower has now finally been found once again, we don’t know what it would take to preserve it or its habitat.

But at least it’s been found. For the elusive Mrs. Barber’s beauty, that’s the first step toward making sure it’s around for at least another 147 years.

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe