Mystery virus threatens an already critically endangered Australian parrot species

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The orange-bellied parrot (Neophema chrysogaster), one of the world's most critically endangered birds, could lose its bid at survival as a virus threatens its vitally important captive breeding program.

The unidentified stomach virus that has struck the program causes the birds to lose their feathers and weakens their immune systems, Shane Radial, a veterinary professor with Charles Sturt University, told the Australian Broadcasting Co. Because the captive parrots live in close proximity to one another, "infections just find it easier to spread from one bird to another," Radial said.

About 160 to 170 orange-bellied parrots live under the auspices of three captive breeding programs: two located on Australia's mainland at Healesville Sanctuary and Adelaide Zoo; one at Taroona on the island of Tasmania. Radial did not identify in which facility the disease is present. Another 50 of the birds exist in the wild.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The nature of the virus has not been established. An unidentified scientist posting on the ProMED mail program for the International Society for Infectious Diseases theorized that it could be avian influenza or proventricular dilatation disease, which hampers food digestion.

The orange-bellied parrot was listed in 2006 as critically endangered under Australia's Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. Once common in Tasmania and Australia, the species has declined in the past 100 years as its coastal salt marsh habitat was destroyed for agricultural purposes. Other threats include the pet trade; the introduction of invasive weeds, some of which are toxic to the birds; and the introduction of non-native predators such as foxes and feral cats. According to the Australian government's national recovery plan for the species, the captive breeding program was previously set back by outbreaks of psittacine circoviral disease in 1991 and what may have been a herpes virus in 2005 and 2006, which killed 43 birds. It is not yet known if the current outbreak has killed any of the birds or just weakened them.

Photo viaWikipedia

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe