Poachers Steal 7 Million South African Abalones a Year

Abalone poaching has soared to near-record levels and is now worth $440 million a year

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A pearly mollusk is worth gold to poachers.

The illegal trade in South African abalone (known locally as perlemoen, Haliotis midae) has soared in recent years. According to data presented this week at a fisheries conference, poachers now steal 7 million abalones a year, up from 4 million in 2008.

The giant sea snails, which can reach 20 centimeters in width, are mostly trafficked to Asia where they are valued as a delicacy and as a purported aphrodisiac.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


South Africa’s Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) puts the value of this illegal trade at close to $440 million a year.

Photo: Derek Keats. Used under Creative Commons license

The country reinstated its limited legal abalone fishing industry a few years ago, but government figures peg the illegal trade at ten times the size of the legal market.

Abalone poachers tend to be local fishers, but smuggling has ties into international syndicates trafficking in multiple species. Earlier this month two men were arrested in Namibia with a kilogram of rhino horn pieces and 100 kilograms of dried abalone. The abalone was valued at more than 2.5 times the value of the rhino horn.

As with most trafficked species, volume matters. Another abalone shipment intercepted by police last month weighed nearly half a ton.

South Africa plans to hold a two-day workshop on perlemoen fishing in three months to discuss regulations and attempts to address the poaching problem. DAFF, meanwhile, has called for abalone poaching to receive the same level of attention and prosecution as rhino poaching. Currently the crime carries a punishment of just a small fine—something easily paid by poachers and smugglers flush with pearly cash.

 

Previously in Extinction Countdown:

Fished Out: Wildlife Group Objects as South Africa Lifts Abalone Ban

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe