Soon the Only Place to See This Nearly Extinct Bird May Be on Samoan Currency

Science has a fairly bland name for the national bird of Samoa: the tooth-billed pigeon (Didunculus strigirostris). The bird’s name in the Samoan language, however, is much more colorful: manumea.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Science has a fairly bland name for the national bird of Samoa: the tooth-billed pigeon (Didunculus strigirostris). The bird's name in the Samoan language, however, is much more colorful: manumea. Samoan currency is also quite colorful and features an image of the manumea on both the 50 sene coin and the 20 tālā banknote:

Unfortunately, there are far more 20 tālā bills in circulation than there are birds in the wild. In 1987 researchers estimated the manumea population at between 4,800 and 7,200. Today that number is as low as 200 birds. A recent 10-day survey in the remote Savai'i uplands region of Samoa revealed just a single manumea, an indication that any remaining birds exist only in highly fragmented populations.

What has caused this dramatic decline of these brightly colored, 30-centimeter birds? No one knows for sure. The population experienced its first crash in the 1990s after several cyclones struck Samoa and flattened more than 70 percent of the nation's forests. Beyond that catastrophe, many other factors appear to also be at play. Rebecca Stirnemann, a PhD student at Massey University in New Zealand who has spent the past several years studying the birds of Samoa, told Radio Australia that invasive rats and cats have taken a toll on the slow-breeding, ground-dwelling species. Manumeas may have also been the victims of agricultural development and hunting.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But it's hard to be sure of the true reasons for the declines because the birds have never been fully studied. Not a single paper on the species has been published in the past 10 years. Scientists don't know exactly what they eat, where they prefer to nest, their group behavior or what environmental factors they rely on for survival. There aren't even any birds in captivity where their behavior can be studied. Stirnemann's research, which is supported by grants from organizations such as the Conservation Leadership Programme, aims to answer some of these questions, provided a viable wild population can even be located for observation.

The manumea is actually a close relative to the long-extinct dodo, most evident in the structure of the two species' parrot-like beaks. Hopefully it will not soon go the way of its more infamous relative. But as Stirnemann says, that will require more work and a lot more funding, which is not readily available in a developing nation such as Samoa. Tragically, that is a story we hear all too often.

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe