Should Tourists Swim with Endangered Sea Turtles?

Researchers in Barbados have found some unusual side effects when people join green turtles in the ocean

Photo by Ben Ramirez. Used under Creative Commons license

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Is wildlife tourism safe for wildlife? It all depends on how it’s done. A new study finds that green turtles (Chelonia mydas) can enjoy a few interesting benefits and a number of dangerous risks when tourists are allowed to swim with them.

The study, published in last month’s issue of Journal of Wildlife Diseases, took place in Barbados, where a thriving tourist industry features numerous opportunities where visitors can jump in the water with sea turtles that swim in the waters around island nation. A team of researchers from the West Indies, U.S. and UK wanted to see how those turtles fared amidst all of this well-intentioned activity. They captured 29 green turtles from four sites around Barbados and gave them each full medical workups to see how they were doing.

The results differed widely depending on where the turtles were captured. As the researchers wrote in their paper, many of the attractions that offer swimming with turtles allow tourists to feed the animals. This supplemental food includes everything from whole or chopped up fish to chicken, hot dogs, bread and “various other leftovers.” The turtles that received this food were, the researchers found, absolutely huge. They had significantly larger carapaces and body weights about three times as heavy as the turtles that came from areas where their diets were not supplemented.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That might not seem like a bad thing—heck, these were all juveniles, and rapid growth means a potentially better chance of survival from predators—but the blood panels and other tests revealed more news. The turtles with supplemented diets also had much higher levels of triglycerides, blood urea nitrogen and cholesterol. In fact, just about everything the researchers tested for in the diet-supplemented turtles existed at higher levels. This, the researchers wrote, leaves the turtles at risk of health conditions include liver disease, gout and cardiovascular issues.

Previous research cited in the paper had already indicted that supplementing green turtles’ diet in Barbados puts the animals at greater risk of boat strikes and other injuries. The animals learn that humans are a food source, which makes them more vulnerable to capture when they swim outside of protected waters. This new research adds to the risk levels created by all of this tourist activity.

That doesn’t mean, however, that the researchers think the industry should be shut down. In fact, they wrote that such an action is unlikely because tourism is an important source of income in Barbados.

But they add that existing codes of conduct may not be enough. The authors suggest that operators should provide turtles with more natural food on a limited basis, perhaps once a day. They also recommend establishing a health-monitoring program to ensure that sea turtles that receive supplemental food aren’t suffering as a result.

So should tourists swim with sea turtles? The paper doesn’t make a recommendation either way, but the conclusions are pretty clear. If you want to go snorkeling with green turtles, go for it. Just leave the hot dogs on the boat.

Previously in Extinction Countdown:

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe