World's smallest water lily saved from extinction

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Two years ago, the world's smallest water lily, a plant known as Nymphaea thermarum whose pads reach only one centimeter in diameter, disappeared from its only habitat, a few square meters near a hot spring in Mashyuza, Rwanda. Local agriculture had drained the spring of most of its water, and as a result, the water lily became extinct in the wild.

Luckily, a few samples had been collected 10 years earlier by the man who discovered the species in 1985, botanist Eberhard Fischer of Koblenz-Landau University in Germany. But unfortunately, the tiny plant proved almost impossible to propagate.

Although Fischer managed to keep the original samples alive at the Bonn Botanical Gardens for more than a decade, seedlings barely grew at all and never reached adulthood.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Last July, Fischer transferred a few seeds and seedlings to the Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, in London. There, after much trial and error, horticulturist Carlos Magdalena made a startling discovery: Nymphaea thermarum does not behave like any other known water lily. All other water-lily species start life as submerged plants until they become large enough to send pads to the surface. That was how Fischer and Magdalena originally tried to grow them.

Magdalena had tried quite a few variations in habitat to try to get the plants to grow. Trials varied the water temperature, the water hardness, pH and depth. No luck.

Then he looked at the original description of the species from when it was discovered. There was the secret: in its natural habitat, Nymphaea thermarum grew in damp mud at a very specific temperature range. Magdalena took that information, planted seeds and seedlings in pots of loam and maintained the water at a consistent level, and kept it all at 25 degrees Celsius. This exposed the plants to greater levels of carbon dioxide and oxygen from the air, and the plants began to flourish. In November, they flowered for the first time.

"Now we have over 30 healthy baby plants growing here at Kew and some are producing seeds," Magdalena said in a prepared statement, "Soon we may have an army of these tiny waterlilies here at Kew. Its future in botanical collections seems secured for the long term."

The plants will be unveiled to the public at a ceremony on Saturday, May 22.

Meanwhile, Fischer has hopes the plant can be reintroduced to its native habitat. According to a Kew spokesperson, the Rwanda Development Board's conservation and tourism office would like to see Nymphaea thermarum back in the wild, and if different waters are tapped for agriculture, the area where it once grew is fully restorable with little investment.

"When I visited Kew earlier this year I couldn't believe that Nymphaea thermarum, which we thought had gone extinct about two years ago, was thriving," said Fischer in a prepared statement. "These 30 plants were the last viable population of this species on the planet and thanks to the work done at Kew we have an opportunity to secure the future of this fascinating, little waterlily."

Photo: Nymphaea thermarum, courtesy of Kew Gardens

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe