A Spirited Debate: How Did Some Alcohols Come to Be Known as Spirits?

It depends on how you trace the word “alcohol.” There are two main candidates in this debate: al-koh’l and al-ghawl

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


With the presidential debates leaving many wondering how any of this could have happened, one part has been predictable--they’ve been accompanied by drinking games.  Those drinking their way through tonight’s presidential debate with more tolerance for their booze than opposing views can opt to steer the conversation away from what's on the screen to what's in their glass to debate the theories on how some alcohols became known as spirits. 


“Spirits” can refer to an eclectic mix of terms--a human soul, a disposition, a member of the Holy Trinity, or even a distilled alcoholic beverage. So how did some alcohols start being called spirits? That depends on how the origin of the word “alcohol” is traced. 


Most believe the word “alcohol” originated in the Middle East since the prefix al is a definite article in Arabic--the debate is about which word it stems from, either al-koh’l or al-ghawl.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


President Lyndon Johnson and Harold Holt, the former prime minister of Australia, enjoy a spirited conversation. Not all alcohols are considered spirits, typically they have to be distilled to categorized as one. Credit: Yoichi Robert Okamoto Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum


One theory is that the word alcohol is derived from al-ghawl. This is the most straightforward way to link alcohol and spirits, as the word means spirit. It’s referenced in The Qur’an--verse 37:47 mentions al-ghawl to refer to a demon or spirit that produces intoxication.


The other theory links it to ancient eyeliner. Please allow me to explain. The black mineral stibnite is very fine powdery substance that was once used as an eyeliner. Known as al-koh’l (koh’l means to stain, paint) it was created through sublimation. Because the process somewhat resembles distillation, some believe it became a generalized term for distilled substances.  “Alcohol” was later used specifically to mean ethanol, with the essence or spirit released through the distillation process.


This may be the more credible theory, as The Oxford English Dictionary lists al-koh’l as the origin for “alcohol.” It notes the word was incorporated into the English language during the sixteenth century. During that same century, “spirit” began to be used to refer to the intoxicating beverage. Here are some examples from the dictionary on their usage:

  • “They put betweene the eye-lids and the eye a certaine black powder...made from a minerall brought from the land of the Fez and called Alcohole....” (Sandys .trav 67, 1615)

  • By extension to fluids of the idea of sublimation: An essence, quintessence, or spirit, obtained by distillation or rectification; as alcohol of wine, essence or spirit of wine. (1672, Philosophy Translation)

  • The pure Substance of anything separated from the more Gross. It is more especially taken for a most subtil and highly refined Powder, and sometimes for a very pure Spirit: Thus the highest rectified Spirit of Wine is called Alcohol Vini. (1706, Phillips, Alcahol or Alcool)


Of course, there are the undecideds out there that think it could have been either al-koh’l or al-ghawl. They point to their similarity in sound, speculating this could have led to confusion between the two words when they were transliterated over the years--something that is very easy

two dewto do.

Layla Eplett writes about the anthropology of food. She has a Masters in Social Anthropology of Development from the University of London's School of Oriental and African Studies and loves getting a taste of all kinds of culture--gastronomic, traditional, and sometimes accidentally, bacterial. Find her at Fare Trade.

More by Layla Eplett

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe