Can Steel Stop Garlic’s Stink?

  It took me a while to come around to garlic. Now, I find it delicious, whether powdered on pizza, fire-roasted, swirled into curries and casseroles, or chopped fresh onto french fries.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


 

It took me a while to come around to garlic. Now, I find it delicious, whether powdered on pizza, fire-roasted, swirled into curries and casseroles, or chopped fresh onto french fries. So, once you've handled garlic, how do you get that pungent odor out of your fingertips?

Mark Lorch, of Chemistry Blog and Try This at Home, proposed a "citizen scientist" experiment yesterday, based on the old wives' tale that stainless steel surfaces could remove garlic smells.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Well, let's try it out!

Before we get into the data, a brief foray into sulfur chemistry. Perhaps element 16 gets a bad rap, since volatile odors from rotten eggs, geysers, and flatulence all contain sulfurous compounds. Names like brimstone and vitriol (sulfuric acid) surely don't help. But sulfur compounds pop up everywhere, from soaps and stain-resistant fabrics to the cores of metabolically important enzymes. Sulfur-sulfur bonds curl your hair, while sulfur-based drugs cure bacterial infections.

Getting back to garlic, we're testing whether allicin (see above), a partially-oxidized disulfur compound responsible for the stinky smell, somehow interacts with metal surfaces. I've recruited a willing volunteer, and the following materials:

After hand-washing, I smeared each palm with a freshly-cut clove for 30 seconds. Trust me, the garlic smell could be readily detected, even at a distance!

Next, we rubbed each palm in circular motions with a stainless-steel dinner spoon and a wooden spoon, again for 30 seconds:

The result? Still stinky! We didn't notice any major differences between the wood- and steel-rubbed palms.

Now, this is just for fun. We're not running multiple controls, performing statistical analysis, or closely controlling variables. But my chemist brain said "OK, let's try some more metals!" In quick order, I found some iron / carbon (hand warmers), copper (a penny) and some titanium (a ring). Like last time, we left these metals in contact with garlic oils for 30 seconds:

Results? The iron and copper surfaces stunk; we actually thought they smelled worse than the skin samples! Strangely, though, the titanium ring smelled only faintly of garlic. Interesting...and completely unexpected.

Readers, if you'd like to try this experiment, write in with what you find, either here or at Mark's place. With more trials, we can plan some more 'scientifically rigorous' studies.

Update: See this 2009 NY Times article for the initial intriguing result.

See Arr Oh is a medicinal chemist working in industry. See Arr Oh blogs at Just Like Cooking and contributes to several other blogs, including Chemjobber, Totally Synthetic, and CENtral Science's The Haystack and Newscripts

More by See Arr Oh

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe