Can Steel Stop Garlic’s Stink?

  It took me a while to come around to garlic. Now, I find it delicious, whether powdered on pizza, fire-roasted, swirled into curries and casseroles, or chopped fresh onto french fries.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


 

It took me a while to come around to garlic. Now, I find it delicious, whether powdered on pizza, fire-roasted, swirled into curries and casseroles, or chopped fresh onto french fries. So, once you've handled garlic, how do you get that pungent odor out of your fingertips?

Mark Lorch, of Chemistry Blog and Try This at Home, proposed a "citizen scientist" experiment yesterday, based on the old wives' tale that stainless steel surfaces could remove garlic smells.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Well, let's try it out!

Before we get into the data, a brief foray into sulfur chemistry. Perhaps element 16 gets a bad rap, since volatile odors from rotten eggs, geysers, and flatulence all contain sulfurous compounds. Names like brimstone and vitriol (sulfuric acid) surely don't help. But sulfur compounds pop up everywhere, from soaps and stain-resistant fabrics to the cores of metabolically important enzymes. Sulfur-sulfur bonds curl your hair, while sulfur-based drugs cure bacterial infections.

Getting back to garlic, we're testing whether allicin (see above), a partially-oxidized disulfur compound responsible for the stinky smell, somehow interacts with metal surfaces. I've recruited a willing volunteer, and the following materials:

After hand-washing, I smeared each palm with a freshly-cut clove for 30 seconds. Trust me, the garlic smell could be readily detected, even at a distance!

Next, we rubbed each palm in circular motions with a stainless-steel dinner spoon and a wooden spoon, again for 30 seconds:

The result? Still stinky! We didn't notice any major differences between the wood- and steel-rubbed palms.

Now, this is just for fun. We're not running multiple controls, performing statistical analysis, or closely controlling variables. But my chemist brain said "OK, let's try some more metals!" In quick order, I found some iron / carbon (hand warmers), copper (a penny) and some titanium (a ring). Like last time, we left these metals in contact with garlic oils for 30 seconds:

Results? The iron and copper surfaces stunk; we actually thought they smelled worse than the skin samples! Strangely, though, the titanium ring smelled only faintly of garlic. Interesting...and completely unexpected.

Readers, if you'd like to try this experiment, write in with what you find, either here or at Mark's place. With more trials, we can plan some more 'scientifically rigorous' studies.

Update: See this 2009 NY Times article for the initial intriguing result.

See Arr Oh is a medicinal chemist working in industry. See Arr Oh blogs at Just Like Cooking and contributes to several other blogs, including Chemjobber, Totally Synthetic, and CENtral Science's The Haystack and Newscripts

More by See Arr Oh

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe