From food waste to gut health

When we eat a food product, we don't typically think about the byproducts of its creation, such as the hazelnut skins left behind when creating a Nutella-like spread.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


When we eat a food product, we don’t typically think about the byproducts of its creation, such as the hazelnut skins left behind when creating a Nutella-like spread. But researchers at the University of California, Davis think these waste streams may actually be gold mines for our gut, providing new sources of prebiotics, nutrients that feed the “good” probiotic bacteria populating our intestines.

Prebiotics benefit health by influencing the amount and types of probiotic bacteria in the intestines. Typically, prebiotics are carbohydrates called oligosaccharides. The gold standard source of prebiotics is human milk, which contains oligosaccharides with very complex structures. Of course, the supply of this ideal source is limited.

“There’s just not enough human milk in the world to suddenly start selling that [as a prebiotic],” said David Mills, a UC Davis professor who studies bacteria that influence gut health. “We have been looking for different sources from different product streams … from wine to coffee … to find structures that might be analogous.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


UC Davis researcher Daniela Barile and colleagues have already identified some potential prebioticsin hazelnut skins, which are a byproduct leftover when hazelnuts are roasted for use in food products. Barile thinks the oligosaccharides found in the hazelnut skins will be more selective than prebiotics currently on the market, such as inulin and galactooligosaccharides, due to their more complex structure. In other words, they will be more likely to encourage the growth of specific types of bacteria.

“A lot of bacteria can thrive on those [inulin and galactooligosaccharides],” Barile said. “We don’t want that. We only want a few species of bacteria to grow.”

As I explained in a post last month, every type of probiotic bacteria is not beneficial to every disease or condition. Similarly, Barile said it’s important to have prebiotics that only encourage the growth of the desired types of bacteria.

With potential found in the hazelnut world, UC Davis researchers are now looking for prebiotics in coffee production byproducts, specifically the fruit that surrounds the coffee bean, which is removed in the production process. While prebiotics from these alternative sources aren’t currently available on supermarket shelves, the idea of repurposing waste to benefit our bodies seems like a venture worth tracking.

 

Julianne Wyrick is a freelance science and health writer currently completing the health and medical journalism graduate program at the University of Georgia. Six years ago she took a chemistry class from a former food scientist, and she's been fascinated by the science of food ever since. She has a bachelor's degree in biochemistry from Asbury University and has interned as a science writer at Fermilab and Alltech, an animal health and nutrition company. While completing her master's, she currently writes about science for UGA's Office of Research Communications. She's also recently written about science and health for Symmetry magazine and Georgia Health News. Find her on the web at juliannewyrick.com or on Twitter @juliannewyrick.

More by Julianne Wyrick

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe