Seeing The Forest Through The Trees: How Wild Foods May Contribute To Food Security

An estimated 870 million people are calorie deficient, but that figure doesnt represent the entire number of people affected by food insecurity.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


An estimated 870 million people are calorie deficient, but that figure doesn’t represent the entire number of people affected by food insecurity. An additional two billion people are also micronutrient deficient, often described as hidden hunger since it can occur even within diets containing adequate amounts of calories. Since wild foods such as fruits, roots, tubers, herbs and mushrooms are rich in micronutrients, they may contribute to improving food security by addressing issues such as hidden hunger.

Bronwen Powell, a research fellow at the Centre for International Forestry Research, has highlighted the nutritional importance of wild foods. According to Powell, there is a need for food security to encompass both quality and quantity. As she explained, “Getting enough micronutrients, without too much energy is important. Many developing countries are facing what is called a double burden of nutrition, where the rates of obesity and over-weight are quickly increasing, but the rates of micronutrient deficiency remain high. In some populations, over-weight people are more likely to be iron deficient than people who are not over-weight. It is essential that diets contain enough micronutrients without too many calories. The nutrient-density of most diets can be increased by increasing the intake fruits, vegetables and legumes and decreasing the amount of fat or refined sugar.”

In a study conducted in the East Usambara Mountains in Tanzania, Powell, Maundu, Kuhnlein, and Johns found that although wild foods obtained from the forest constituted less than 3% of food items consumed and contributed only 2% of total energy in the diet, they contributed large percentages of micronutrients--19% iron, 31% vitamin A (RAE) (31%), and 20% vitamin C. The inclusion of these wild foods can be particularly important since micronutrient deficiency has health implications. According to the World Health Organization, nearly two billion people suffer from iron deficiency, making it the most common and widespread nutritional disorder in the world. In addition to impairing growth and cognitive development, iron deficiency can have more far reaching consequences by impacting work productivity and contributing to lost earnings. Following iron, vitamin A is the next most prevalent micronutrient deficiency worldwide, significantly impacting pregnant women and children.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Wild foods may also contribute to food security because they are relatively inexpensive and often function as safety nets during food insecure seasons such as drought or excessive rain. In order for wild foods to effectively contribute to food security, there are some issues to consider, including gender disparities within gathering and collection, improving access and promoting sustainability. For more on their potential benefits and challenges, have a listen to this podcast:

Image Credit: David Ashby

Layla Eplett writes about the anthropology of food. She has a Masters in Social Anthropology of Development from the University of London's School of Oriental and African Studies and loves getting a taste of all kinds of culture--gastronomic, traditional, and sometimes accidentally, bacterial. Find her at Fare Trade.

More by Layla Eplett

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe