Seeing The Forest Through The Trees: How Wild Foods May Contribute To Food Security

An estimated 870 million people are calorie deficient, but that figure doesnt represent the entire number of people affected by food insecurity.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


An estimated 870 million people are calorie deficient, but that figure doesn’t represent the entire number of people affected by food insecurity. An additional two billion people are also micronutrient deficient, often described as hidden hunger since it can occur even within diets containing adequate amounts of calories. Since wild foods such as fruits, roots, tubers, herbs and mushrooms are rich in micronutrients, they may contribute to improving food security by addressing issues such as hidden hunger.

Bronwen Powell, a research fellow at the Centre for International Forestry Research, has highlighted the nutritional importance of wild foods. According to Powell, there is a need for food security to encompass both quality and quantity. As she explained, “Getting enough micronutrients, without too much energy is important. Many developing countries are facing what is called a double burden of nutrition, where the rates of obesity and over-weight are quickly increasing, but the rates of micronutrient deficiency remain high. In some populations, over-weight people are more likely to be iron deficient than people who are not over-weight. It is essential that diets contain enough micronutrients without too many calories. The nutrient-density of most diets can be increased by increasing the intake fruits, vegetables and legumes and decreasing the amount of fat or refined sugar.”

In a study conducted in the East Usambara Mountains in Tanzania, Powell, Maundu, Kuhnlein, and Johns found that although wild foods obtained from the forest constituted less than 3% of food items consumed and contributed only 2% of total energy in the diet, they contributed large percentages of micronutrients--19% iron, 31% vitamin A (RAE) (31%), and 20% vitamin C. The inclusion of these wild foods can be particularly important since micronutrient deficiency has health implications. According to the World Health Organization, nearly two billion people suffer from iron deficiency, making it the most common and widespread nutritional disorder in the world. In addition to impairing growth and cognitive development, iron deficiency can have more far reaching consequences by impacting work productivity and contributing to lost earnings. Following iron, vitamin A is the next most prevalent micronutrient deficiency worldwide, significantly impacting pregnant women and children.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Wild foods may also contribute to food security because they are relatively inexpensive and often function as safety nets during food insecure seasons such as drought or excessive rain. In order for wild foods to effectively contribute to food security, there are some issues to consider, including gender disparities within gathering and collection, improving access and promoting sustainability. For more on their potential benefits and challenges, have a listen to this podcast:

Image Credit: David Ashby

Layla Eplett writes about the anthropology of food. She has a Masters in Social Anthropology of Development from the University of London's School of Oriental and African Studies and loves getting a taste of all kinds of culture--gastronomic, traditional, and sometimes accidentally, bacterial. Find her at Fare Trade.

More by Layla Eplett

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe