It's the End of the Year, Not the End of the World

2016 was not without its hopeful moments for science and the environment, and perhaps, even the seeds of optimism for the new year ahead

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


As we move towards the end of 2016, you might be forgiven for looking back on the year that was with a certain feeling of doom and gloom—particularly when it comes to the environment. This past 12 months has certainly seen more than it’s fair share of gloomy headlines; with reports of record high global temperatures, mass coral bleaching events, and at least 10,000 species believed to have become extinct. What a year it has been!

But 2016 was not without its hopeful moments, and perhaps, even the seeds of optimism for the new year ahead.

Just one of 2016’s good news stories came from the heart of oil country, where the conservative Texas city of Georgetown made headlines for becoming one of the largest cities in America to receive 100 percent of it's energy from renewable sources. “This was a business decision and it was a no-brainer,” said Mayor Dale Ross, when asked why he made the change. “I don’t have a degree in environmental science or anything, [but] seems to me that the wind and sun will be out in Texas for many, many years.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Thanks to renewable energy projects like the one in Georgetown, 2016 will also be remembered as the year greenhouse gas emissions plateaued—even as economic output continued to grow. Data from the International Energy Agency (IEA) showed global emissions of carbon dioxide have remained essentially flat throughout the entire year. Some had speculated that cutting emissions would come at the expense of global economic growth, but in fact, IMF figures suggest the global economy grew during 2016 at a rate of more than 3 percent. It seems 2016 will be one of the first years in human history where economic growth decoupled from greenhouse gas emissions—a significant achievement!

And 2016 was not just about human achievements. This year will also be fondly remembered by the Giant Panda, which was finally declared 'not endangered' after a century-long battle against extinction. The plight of the Giant Panda has long held special significance to the conservation community, with the panda adopted as the official symbol for the WWF in 1961. More than 50 years later, in September 2016, the status of the Giant Panda was finally downgraded from ‘endangered’ to ‘vulnerable’ on the global list of species at risk of extinction—a big win for biodiversity!

In celebration of these unsung success stories, the Smithsonian Institute in Washington D.C. will also host the world’s first-ever Earth Optimism Summit, scheduled to coincide with Earth Day, on April 22, 2017. They’ve even launched a special hashtag, #EarthOptimism, to track these positive case studies on social media—and to provide a source of optimism if the year’s end gloom creeps into your new year’s celebrations!

The year may be ending. But the earth, it seems, is still hanging in there.   

 

Jayde Lovell is a STEM communicator for the New York Hall of Science, a resident science host for The Young Turks, and a STEM 'muse' for AOL's Cambio platform. Lovell holds a degree in neuroscience and is the host of her own YouTube channel, 'Did Someone Say Science'. She has produced videos for organizations such as the American Institute of Physics and Rolls Royce Engineering, and she has been featured in EducationWeek, Fortune, Men's Health and Mashable. Lovell is currently in development for her pilot TV script 'SEC's' (a teen drama centered around the lives of student engineers), for which she received funding from The MacGyver Foundation.

More by Jayde Lovell

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe