Lindau Nobel Meeting--Bearing the Fruits of Global Health Research

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The panel on global health at the opening ceremony of the 61st Meeting of Nobel Laureates in Lindau well and truly laid the gauntlet down to young researchers from around the world. On the panel was: Bill Gates, chairman of Microsoft and co-founder of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Ada Yonath, Noble Laureate in Chemistry 2009 for her groundbreaking crystallography work revealing the structure and function of the ribosome; Sandra Chishimba, a malaria researcher from Zambia; and Jonathan Carlson, a researcher into HIV/AIDS at Microsoft Research.

Bill Gates said that we must pay more attention to the 'silent voices' in poor countries, who don't have their medical needs met by funding from their governments or companies. It sounds unbelievable, but he told us that 10 times more research funding goes into finding a cure for male baldness than finding a cure for malaria - which kills 850,000 people a year.

Gates asserts that doing basic research is really important to solving global health problems. He said that his foundation seeks out "people who are good at imaging, people who are good at nanotechnology. Their basic thinking could apply to global health in the future."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ada Yonath recommends first identifying a problem, if not in global health, then related to global health. She advises: "Look for some indications you are going to make it. If you stick to them [it could result in] a new drug, procedure or understanding or immune response."

Sandra Chishimba (image left) stressed the importance of scientific research to our well-being today. For instance, if someone had not worked on, and prioritised the smallpox vaccine, all of us would probably all have had it. Now, we need to prioritise malaria, she said. Her challenge laid down to the audience was simply: "We've all seen somebody suffering from a disease. So we should pay attention to such things as global health. We all need to be healthy."

Jonathan Carlson encouraged the scientific community to find a way to share data, because the potential to help people is huge. He said: "We have been generating vast amounts of data. In HIV [research], we are looking at tonnes of data for T cell responses, B cell responses, tonnes of genetic data. But yet we have no way to officially merge this data. I think it's a technical problem that is very achievable - to pool data and share it from different sources, and its solution will really help the lives of many."

Aiming squarely at foundations and philanthropists, Yonath also called for more investment in research that was seen as a risk: "To fund the roots of the trees that will be fruitful later on. Tomorrow is another day but there is another day after tomorrow."

Bill gates agreed this was the role of the foundation in the current straightened financial times - to take a risk on less experienced investigators, rather than proven researchers. However, he admitted they hadn't yet completely cracked the way to fund novel research.

The panel (from l-r: Gates, Chishimba, the moderator Adam Smith, Yonath, Carlson), Photos: Rolf Schultes

 

About the author: Christine Ottery is a freelance science writer who writes on for the Guardian,TheEcologist.co.uk,SciDev.net and Wired magazine. She recently graduated from a MA Science Journalism at City University London, U.K. She blogs at Open Minds and Parachutes and tweets at @christineottery.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Cross-posted on the official site of the Lindau Nobel Community —the interactive home of the Lindau Meetings.

Christine Ottery is a journalist with a very broad range interests and a MA in science journalism from City University. In the past year she has written about art and science for the New Scientist, technology for Wired UK, neuroscience for the Dana Foundation, international development for SciDev.net, 'the female Viagra' for Comment is Free, and the environment for TheEcologist.co.uk and the Guardian. On top of all this, Christine has been known to blog, tweet, present podcasts, deliver talks and film and produce for online broadcast.

More by Christine Ottery

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe