Lindau Nobel Meeting--Stressed Mind, Stressed DNA

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


It was an accidental mutation of the Tetrahymena thermophila (left), a pond organism, during a lab experiment that revealed that the enzyme telomerase keeps the protective caps on the end of chromosomes long. Speaking at the 61st Meeting of Nobel Laureates at Lindau, Elisabeth Blackburn compared the caps, called telomeres, to the tips on the end of a shoelace that prevent it from fraying. Telomeres protect DNA during cell division.

Most Tetrahymena are immortal, Blackburn explained, and they have lots of telemorase, but the mutant had shorter and shorter telomeres over time, so its cells started to die. It was found that the mutant had no telemorase in its cells.

The mystery of the function of telomeres (right) had been solved. Labs from around the world began to work on the implications of telomeres for human health.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Many of the diseases of ageing, including cancers, are associated with the shortening of telomeres," Blackburn said. Others include: pulmonary fibrosis, cardiovascular disease, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, diabetes. Even the risk factors for these diseases increases with short telomeres.

With a global aging population, the importance of tackling these chronic diseases is increasing. Diabetes is a worldwide problem, for instance, affecting 10 per cent of people in the developing and developed world.

Luckily, stopping our own telomeres from shortening - or possibly even restoring them - is potentially something within our grasp. Chronic life stress and multiple trauma exposures are implicated in telomere shortness, Blackburn said, as are pessimism and hostility. But education, excercise and stress reduction are factors in preventing telomere shortening, thereby reducing the risk of disease.

Blackburn encouraged the audience to get involved in telomere research. She said that there is so much data on telemores, including 675,000 genetic snips, that there is a lot of work yet to be done to determine how chronic diseases can be prevented.

You can watch the video of Blackburn's fascinating talk below:

Images: Tetrahymena, from Wikimedia commons. Photos of Blackburn and of her slide of chromosomes - Christine Ottery.

About the author: Christine Ottery is a freelance science writer who writes on for the Guardian,TheEcologist.co.uk,SciDev.net and Wired magazine. She recently graduated from a MA Science Journalism at City University London, U.K. She blogs at Open Minds and Parachutes and tweets at @christineottery.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Cross-posted on the official site of the Lindau Nobel Community —the interactive home of the Lindau Meetings: Take control of your telomeres - Elizabeth Blackburn

Christine Ottery is a journalist with a very broad range interests and a MA in science journalism from City University. In the past year she has written about art and science for the New Scientist, technology for Wired UK, neuroscience for the Dana Foundation, international development for SciDev.net, 'the female Viagra' for Comment is Free, and the environment for TheEcologist.co.uk and the Guardian. On top of all this, Christine has been known to blog, tweet, present podcasts, deliver talks and film and produce for online broadcast.

More by Christine Ottery

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe