Too Hard for Science? Dean Kamen--Defying Gravity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A silent jetpack would be like swimming in air, but it is likely beyond the physics of thrust

In "Too Hard for Science?" I interview scientists about ideas they would love to explore that they don't think could be investigated. For instance, they might involve machines beyond the realm of possibility, such as particle accelerators as big as the sun, or they might be completely unethical, such as lethal experiments involving people. This feature aims to look at the impossible dreams, the seemingly intractable problems in science. However, the question mark at the end of "Too Hard for Science?" suggests that nothing might be impossible.

The inventor:Dean Kamen, creator of the first wearable infusion pump and the Segway, and founder of DEKA Research & Development Corp.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The idea: "I've always loved flight," says Kamen, who pilots and owns helicopters and jets. "I would love a jetpack that doesn't make noise, a device that, without commotion, would allow me to defy gravity. You would just liberate yourself from the ground, go swimming in the air."

The problem: "The basic physics of thrust mean that if you want to fight against the gravitational field of Earth and weigh, say, 100 kilos, you need to accelerate that amount away from you at 9.8 meters per second squared," Kamen says. "Air is ethereal, it has low density, about 1 kilo per cubic meter, so you have to continuously accelerate 100 cubic meters of air at 9.8 meters per second squared or the equivalent to compensate for the gravitational attraction of Earth."

"You can try to do this by moving a lot of air relatively slowly with rotors, or a small amount of gas really fast, like with a rocket, to get enough thrust," Kamen says. "If you're using a rocket, typically the gas goes hypersonic, which means it's very loud and you need a lot of energy to do it. If you're using large rotors, those are very noisy too."

The solution? On Kamen's show Dean of Invention, he discussed NASA's concept for a super-quiet, hover-capable one-person electric aircraft named the Puffin that looks much like a jetpack with a cockpit.

"That might be close," Kamen says. "Still, I wish there was something you could strap on your belt and allow you to leap tall buildings with a single bound. I don't need Superman's cape, but I'd love that experience in every other aspect."

Image of Dean Kamen from his Web page.

*

If you have a scientist you would like to recommend I question, or you are a scientist with an idea you think might be too hard for science, e-mail me at toohardforscience@gmail.com

Follow Too Hard for Science? on Twitter by keeping track of the #2hard4sci hashtag.

About the Author:Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time he has traveled to all seven continents. Follow him on Twitter@cqchoi.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe