Battlefield Earth – the Geological Legacy of War

It was during the first World War that the impact of human warfare on the landscape exponentially  increased. Large armies equipped with the most advanced military technology- especially the high energy explosives evolved rapidly – devastated entire landscapes along the Western Front, stretching from the English Channel to the Swiss mountains.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


It was during the first World War that the impact of human warfare on the landscape exponentially increased. Large armies equipped with the most advanced military technology- especially the high energy explosives evolved rapidly - devastated entire landscapes along the Western Front, stretching from the English Channel to the Swiss mountains. One of the most iconic sites of this attrition warfare was the area surrounding the French town of Verdun.

February 21, 1916 the first shell - with a caliber of 38 centimeters and weight of 750 kilograms - was fired by a modified long-range naval gun nicknamed "Long Max". After the German attack, soon French counterattacked. From February to August 1916 in an area of 200 km2 estimated 60 million rounds were fired.

All those explosions destroyed the local vegetation, reshaped and lowered the landscape, but also remixed the natural formed soil-layers and fractured the underlying bedrock - the effects of those few months are still visible today, almost 100 years after the war ended.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The geographers Joseph P. Hupy and Randall J. Schaetzl visited the battlefield of Verdun to investigate how the great war modified the landscape and influenced its further development. The artillery fire changed how and which type of soil can form - so much that the authors suggest that the modern use of bombs and explosives is such a significant erosion factor that it deserves a own term: Bombturbation.

Fig.1.Fort Doaumont, part of the fortifications of Verdun, before 1916 and at the end of April/May 1916 (image in public domain), dotted with explosion craters.

When an average WWI grenade exploded, it excavated a crater with a diameter several meters across and 1-2 meters deep, however large mines excavated also craters 15 m in diameter with depths exceeding 10m.

The explosion fractures the shallow bedrock and redeposit material (soil and rock fragments) on the outer rim of the crater, forming also lenses of gravel-ejecta. With time the barren crater will fill with new sediments, especially litter, from the slowly returning vegetation. As the area of Verdun is characterized also by a shallow water table, many bomb craters filled with water, forming shallow ponds where fine-grained clay and peat accumulates, resulting in water logged soils.

Fig.2. Postbombturbative battlefield of Verdun in 2005, uploaded by user 01.camille on Wikimedia Commons (2005), image in public domain.

In dry craters the fractured bedrock increases the infiltration of water and accelerates the chemical weathering of the limestone. The fissures in the rocks are also a good habitat for earthworms, as the two researchers observed an increased worm activity inside the craters. The earthworms transport incessantly litter and plant debris from the surface to the crater bottoms, where the leaching organic acids will attack the undisturbed rock. In explosion craters the now occurring soils are therefore thicker than in the undisturbed landscape, where thinner "natural" soils occur.

After WWI, the "The War to end all Wars", unfortunately many other - even greater and with more bombturbative power - wars followed. During WWII estimated 1,3 billion kilograms of bombs were dropped on Europe, a number paled by the 1,27 trillion kilograms of bombs and explosives deployed in the Vietnam War. All the conflicts of the 20th century are estimated to have moved billions of cubic meters of earth materials, another erosive legacy of the Anthropocene.

Bibliography:

HUPY, J.P. & SCHAETZL, R.J. (2006): Introducing "Bombturbation," a singular type of soil disturbance and mixing. Soil Science, Vol.171(11): 823-836

HUPY, J.P. & SCHAETZL, R.J. (2008): Soil development on the WWI battlefield of Verdun, France. Geoderma Vol.145: 37-49

HUPY, J.P. & KOEHLER, T. (2012): Modern warfare as a significant form of zoogeomorphic disturbance upon the landscape. Geomorphology, Vol. 157-158: 169-182

My name is David Bressan and I'm a freelance geologist working mainly in the Austroalpine crystalline rocks and the South Alpine Palaeozoic and Mesozoic cover-sediments in the Eastern Alps. I graduated with a project on Rock Glaciers dynamics and hydrology, this phase left a special interest for quaternary deposits and modern glacial environments. During my research on glaciers, studying old maps, photography and reports on the former extent of these features, I became interested in history, especially the development of geomorphologic and geological concepts by naturalists and geologists. Living in one of the key area for the history of geology, I combine field trips with the historic research done in these regions, accompanied by historic maps and depictions. I discuss broadly also general geological concepts, especially in glaciology, seismology, volcanology, palaeontology and the relationship of society and geology.

More by David Bressan

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe