This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American
![776px-Afghan_girls_from_Ghazni_province[1]](https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/illusion-chasers/files/2013/05/776px-Afghan_girls_from_Ghazni_province1-300x231.jpg)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Afghan_girls_from_Ghazni_province.jpg
Neuroscience can be lots of fun, but perhaps even more so when researchers study the brain’s Laughter Perception Network. This is no laughing matter: In a PloS One study out today, Dirk Wildgruber and his colleagues at three different universities in Germany and the UK, found that the brain responds differently to fMRI imaging of ticklish versus socially complex laughter (joyful and taunting laughter) areas of the brain.
You can try the different sounds files below (I recommend listening to the evil taunting cackle in particular).
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Sound S1 (WAV).Exemplar of joyful laughter.
Sound S2 (WAV).Exemplar of tickling laughter.
Sound S3 (WAV).Exemplar of taunting laughter.
The authors concluded that different types of human laughter modulate connectivity in different, but partially overlapping brain regions.
I assume that none of the experimental participants suffered from gelotophobia. It’s not an irrational aversion to Italian ice cream, but the fear of being laughed at.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber