Why Romantic Illusions Are a Good Thing

Scientists believe that idealizing one's partner can work as a self-fulfilling prophecy, where illusion eventually becomes reality. That is to say, people can help to create the partners they wish they had, by exaggerating their virtues and minimizing their faults in their own minds.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Romancing the illusion (Wikimedia Commons)

Love is not exactly blind, but it doesn’t have 20:20 vision either. A large body of research has sought to determine how illusions play into romance, and whether idealizing one’s partner is beneficial or detrimental to the long-term success of the relationship.

Research findings overwhelmingly support the hypothesis that positive illusions are rampant, not only at the beginning of a romantic relationship, but even years into it. People of both genders rate their partners as more attractive than their partners rate themselves, and also tend to embellish non-physical virtues, such as their partners kindness and intelligence. Such optimistic misperceptions are thought to enhance and stabilize long-term bonding.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This perceptual departure, although not completely disconnected from reality, may be evolutionarily advantageous: idealized love may be an “evolved commitment device” that enables romantic partners to invest heavily, and for long stretches of time, in each other and their offspring. Data from 168 newlywed couples who participated in a 13-year longitudinal study of marriage indicated that spouses that idealized one another as newlyweds were less likely to suffer declines in love as time progressed. Other research indicates that idealizing a partner, and being idealized, at the beginning of a relationship, provides a buffer against the forces that tend to diminish fulfillment, leading to more stable romances. In a different longitudinal study, people who idealized their partners highly as newlyweds experienced no decline in satisfaction after 3 years of marriage.

You should look at your partner through rose-tinted glasses (Wikimedia Commons)

Even more intriguing, some scientists believe that idealizing one’s partner can work as a self-fulfilling prophecy, where illusion eventually becomes reality. That is to say, people can help to create the partners they wish they had, by exaggerating their virtues and minimizing their faults in their own minds. This research suggests that individuals may come to see themselves in a more positive light when their romantic partners idealize them and encourage them to act in ways that mirror and support the illusion. In such cases, love is not blind but prophetic.

Cupid resisting the blindfold (Wikimedia Commons)

So, even if conventional wisdom cautions lovers against being too idealistic, the empirical evidence makes a case for putting a positive spin on how we perceive our romantic partners.

It also suggests that we should seek life partners that hold us in better regard than we do ourselves.

Discovering a new and improved image or myself was never high in my list of reasons to choose a romantic partner -- but I lucked out anyway. Twelve years ago, I married somebody who never wavered in his belief in me, at a time when I wasn’t sure that I had it in me to pursue a science career. Today, I am a better scientist, and a better person, because of him.

Happy Valentine’s Day, Steve.

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe