How wi-fi would look like

Image of the Week #104, August 13th, 2013: From: Physics Week in Review: August 10, 2013 by Jennifer Ouellette at Cocktail Party Physics. Source: Nickolay Lamm Cocktail Party Physics is never a blog to shy away from stunning imagery.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Image of the Week #104, August 13th, 2013:

From:Physics Week in Review: August 10, 2013 by Jennifer Ouellette at Cocktail Party Physics.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Source:Nickolay Lamm

Cocktail Party Physics is never a blog to shy away from stunning imagery. Jennifer Ouellette has a gift for finding compelling images that make you say, “Of course!” about concepts in physics. Wi-fi, the communicative force of our times that is never as ubiquitous as we would like: how would it appear to us if we could see it? Artist and researcher Nickolay Lamm shows us an interpretation that almost makes us wish for the visual noise to distract us from our smartphones.

Make sure to check out the other fascinating alternative views of our modern world on Lamm’s blog, and the rest of the links at Ouellette’s Physics Week in Review: August 10, 2013 at Cocktail Party Physics.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe