New Scientist Prize For Science Writing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Are you a student attending an Australian or New Zealander university? Have you been mulling over writing a science story for a while? Then this competition is an ideal opportunity to fire up Microsoft Word and get cracking. Oh, and you stand a chance to get your story published on New Scientist’s website.

The NewScientist Prize for Science Writing is giving current university students (undergrad and postgrad) enrolled in an Australian or New Zealander university the opportunity to submit previously unpublished feature articles or editorials covering all aspects of science. Space, microbes, weird animals, microbes in weird animals, microbes in weird animals which are sent to space... you get the idea. Just make sure the style fits that of New Scientist’s.

Quoting its website (note that $ signifies Australian dollar):


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


First prize will be $1,500, and the winning article will be published on the New Scientist website. Second prize will be $750 and third prize will be $250. The three winning entries will also be given a complementary yearly subscription to the New Scientist magazine.

The competition closes next Friday, September 21. You’ve got the weekend so don’t panic (but then again, Australians rarely panic). Submissions will be judged by your typical intimidating panel of reputable scientists, science writers and editors. This year, you will have to impress the likes of Dr Karl Kruszelnicki, author of 31 popular science books, Professor Ian Chubb, Chief Scientist for Australia, and Sumit Paul-Choudhury, news editor of newscientist.com, amongst others.

The New Scientist Prize for Science Writing website also has a list of criteria which the judges will use to, well, judge your submission. List reproduced here in full:

  • Newsworthiness: timely work that adds to or encourages debate on current issues

  • Depth and detail: of coverage of issues or discoveries, and the quality of science explanation involved

  • Scientific accuracy: work is factually correct

  • Impact: work makes a balanced and significant contribution to greater public understanding and appreciation of contemporary issues or developments in science

  • Creativity in communicating concepts and ideas: work engenders interest by using creative and clear communication

  • Appropriateness of content: material is pitched at the right level in terms of complexity and technical issues for the audience involved

  • Adherence to ethical standards: work adheres to the highest standard of investigative journalism—including the MEAA Code of Ethics.

To summarise:

  • Submissions may be about any aspect of science and should be in the form of short features or editorials.

  • You should be attending an Australian or New Zealander university.

  • Deadline: September 21

  • Submission instructions here.

More info:

Happy writing and all the best!

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe