Pitch Database By Young Science Writers For Young Science Writers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Getting your first couple of pitches accepted is a pain. And when you finally succeed in getting that pitch just right for, say, Scientific American, you have to start all over again and figure out how to get the thumbs up from New Scientist. Or Nature, perhaps... Different publications have different editors who want different types of articles... and pitches. It’s a complicated world for the young and early-career science writer.

In an attempt to simplify things, Bora and I set up “Operation Database of the Future”, a public Google Doc spreadsheet contributed by young and early-career science writers, for young and early-career science writers.

What is “Operation Database of the Future”?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


?       A depository of successful pitches junior science writers are willing to share with fellow junior science writers;

?       A database which consists of some important information and tips about how and what to pitch to the different publications;

?       A place to start networking with “friends in low places” (and not-so-low places).

By sharing both successful pitches and some tips, you, as a contributor, can provide fellow junior science writers with more information about various publications, from their topics of preference to contact details, etcetera. You can also share your contact details (email address, Twitter handle) if you’re willing to be contacted by fellow writers in the future.

“Operation Database of the Future” is a crowdsourcing experiment. So, in essence, it’s your experiment. If the experiment works, it will be buzzing with activity, be helpful to junior science writers and have a life of its own. To make it work, you can contribute in a number of ways: add some info about a couple of publications you’ve interned or worked for or been published by; fill in a couple of columns; share the link to the database with fellow junior science writers; email us with any feedback or ideas you may have; check out the pitches and info shared by fellow writers!

Who better to help out junior science writers than fellow junior science writers, right?

====================

Publications currently listed in “OperationDatabaseoftheFuture”:

  1. Scitable, Nature Education, NPG

  2. Chemistry World, Royal Society of Chemistry

  3. Significance, Royal Statistical Society

  4. Scientific American Guest Blog

  5. Los Angeles Times

  6. New Humanist

  7. The Register

  8. BBC Focus magazine

  9. Pod Academy

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe