Twitter For Science Writers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In this digital age, journalists and writers are increasingly having to focus on producing content online, be it the long-form feature stories, the news articles or the opinionated blog posts. Producing content online is becoming a significant—if not exclusive—source of income for many. As such, it makes sense for the journalists and writers, science ones included, to market and promote themselves online. A really good way to push your name (i.e. brand) online is through social media, especially Twitter.

On Twitter, those 140-character long tweets you produce are basically 140-character long blurbs. What you say on Twitter reflect your areas of expertise, your personality, your enthusiasm and much more about you. And if they aren’t already, you can expect editors and potential employers to routinely scan through your Twitter feed to see if you’re a good fit for what they have in mind. It’s therefore a good idea to make full use of your Twitter account.

Over at Poynter., Kelly Fincham has very good advice about use of Twitter for young journalists. Here are some of them:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


  1. Assume that everything you tweet is public, even from a private account;

  2. Tweet with a purpose and be professional;

  3. Add value with each tweet & see the bigger picture;

  4. Give credit;

  5. Be respectful and responsive.

One advice that Fincham missed is to build and converse with a network of your peers and people in your sphere. As an early-career science writer, you should follow and connect with the science twitterverse. Start building your network by following this Twitter list of early-career science writers and the interesting people these writers follow. Then converse with your network by sharing thoughtful and interesting perspectives and eliciting discussions. Chances are that people will notice you sooner rather than later.

Liz Heron, director of social media and engagement at The Wall Street Journal, has some further advice for the more emphatic journalists on Twitter. As part of a Q&A by Casey Capachi, Heron answers such questions as:

  1. If I write that retweets are not endorsements in my Twitter bio, will that help make it clear?

  2. How can you utilize social media to find sources?

  3. What would you say to a reporter looking to get started with social media?

  4. How do you get people to follow your account?

Twitter is not only a promotional tool. It’s a journalistic tool as well (although one can argue that promoting content is a necessary skill for the present-day journalist). You can use Twitter to research stories, search for sources, crowdsource for ideas, keep informed with the latest news, stumble across valuable content. You can even use Twitter to turn your stories into conversations.

These two faces of Twitter—as a promotional and journalistic tool—are perhaps what makes it such an important tool. Since it has the potential to help produce and promote content, Twitter is by the journalist’s side from beginning to end.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe