Frustration of the day: unclear article numbers

Over the past couple of days, I have been reviewing some citations for student projects.  Several of the students submitted citations in which they expressed confusion over what page numbers to include.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Over the past couple of days, I have been reviewing some citations for student projects. Several of the students submitted citations in which they expressed confusion over what page numbers to include.

The problem: Many journals no longer publish a print version and have switched to using article numbers. Unfortunately, some publishers make these article numbers difficult to find and often don’t label them.

Example 1: Several Springer journals caused trouble for my students. The journal provides relatively clear metadata at the bottom of the article landing page, with the exception of failing to label the volume and article numbers.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Opening the article PDF doesn’t help much. At the top of the page is a lot of important information about the article, but the volume and article numbers aren’t labeled.

Example #2: Compounding the issue is that some journals have a “cite this article” feature that provides a citation using an article number that I wasn’t able to find listed anywhere else. In the screenshot below, I had to click on “How to Cite” to open the suggested citation in which the article number was listed.

The Wiley article includes this number in the PDF version, but doesn’t clearly label it in any way.

This lack-of-clarity frustrated my students trying to create their citations, and it frustrated me as I explained over-and-over what was going on and acknowledged that no, this doesn’t make any sense.

In previous posts, I urged publishers to be clear about their peer review processes and abandon journal title abbreviations. This week, I’d really like them to add just a couple of words clarifying what the numbers mean.

Coda:

The article numbers may just be a temporary feature. As DOIs become the accepted standard for referring to articles, we may find that page numbers and article numbers and issue numbers and even volume numbers go away. But in the meantime, page numbers or article numbers are required for almost all citation styles and publishers could make them a bit easier to find.

About Bonnie Swoger

Bonnie J. M. Swoger is a Science and Technology Librarian at a small public undergraduate institution in upstate New York, SUNY Geneseo. She teaches students about the science literature, helps faculty and students with library research questions and leads library assessment efforts. She has a BS in Geology from St. Lawrence University, an MS in Geology from Kent State University and an MLS from the University at Buffalo. She would love to have some free time in which to indulge in hobbies. She blogs at the Undergraduate Science Librarian and can be found on twitter @bonnieswoger.

More by Bonnie Swoger

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe