69th Carnival of Evolution: Darwin’s Day Edition

Welcome to the 69th edition of the Carnival of Evolution! As February 12th was Darwin’s birthday, this is a Darwin’s Day carnival edition. To start with there’s a celebration of all things Darwinian at Synthetic Daisies, and a letter to the man himself for his 205th birthday.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Welcome to the 69th edition of the Carnival of Evolution! As February 12th was Darwin's birthday, this is a Darwin's Day carnival edition. To start with there's a celebration of all things Darwinian at Synthetic Daisies, and a letter to the man himself for his 205th birthday.

Darwin didn't know it existed, but nowadays the study of evolution is often the study of genetics and DNA. L. Moran has a follow-up post to P.Z Myers comments on the neutral theory of genetic drift. There's further discussion about the role of genetic selection and drift over at eco-evolutionary dynamics and a post on horizontal gene transfer on phylonetworks.

Carl Zimmer puts the genetic principles into practice looking at the family tree of the calabash plant while Anne Buchanan explores the evolution of biomineralization; the process of laying down minerals such as calcium within the body. Meanwhile Danielle Whittaker uses mathematical modelling to explore how changes in the environment affect phytoplankton.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The recent "Ham vs. Nye" debate sparked discussion all over the internet, as a scientist and creationist discussed the issue of evolution. Greg Laden discusses who 'won' the debate (Bill Nye!) while Dr. Zachary Blount adds his own views while discussing his work on evolution in bacteria. Chris Reynolds looks at the debate in the context of the evolution of human brains and intelligence. There's also a post from Troy Britain, which discusses the difference between lizard hipped and bird hipped dinosaurs in the context of misinformation from Answers in Genesis. Jeremy Yoder questions whether a prominent creationist should be able to lecture in a university microbiology course.

One of the biggest challenges for the creationists of Darwin's time was human evolution. There's a post about our ape-like ancestors from The Mermaid's Tale with some exciting new research on the ape in the trees and a discussion of the definition of the human genus from John Hawks. From the university of Vermont, we also have a study on sexual selection in human populations.

As well as studying genetics evolutionary scientists also explore populations such as in this study of mating behaviour in water striders. There are also strong evolutionary pressures on bringing up young, as shown in studies of birds. There's a great critical analysis of the theory of group selection focusing on research on a population of monkeyflowers from the same blog, along with a post on breeding designs and the use of contextual analysis to study community ecology.

That's it from this edition of the Carnival of Evolution. For more evolutionary goodness, follow on twitter or facebook and check out previous editions on the carnival blog. Don't forget to submit your posts for next weeks carnival!

All the Darwin images are from wikimedia commons.

About S.E. Gould

A biochemist with a love of microbiology, the Lab Rat enjoys exploring, reading about and writing about bacteria. Having finally managed to tear herself away from university, she now works for a small company in Cambridge where she turns data into manageable words and awesome graphs.

More by S.E. Gould

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe