Categorising bacteria in purple and pink

When confronted with a new bacteria there are a series of simple tests that can be carried out to give a rough idea of the properties of the bacteria you are dealing with.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


When confronted with a new bacteria there are a series of simple tests that can be carried out to give a rough idea of the properties of the bacteria you are dealing with. One of the simplest and most useful tests is known as "Gram staining" which is a process of staining cells either purple or pink depending on the properties of their cell walls. It was discovered by Christian Gram who wasn't initially trying to find a test for bacteria, he just wanted to make them visible.

Gram staining colours the bacteria either purple, in which case they are referred to as "Gram positive," or pink which are known as "Gram negative". Although Christian Gram didn't realise it at the time, this different response to the staining technique is due to a fundamental and important change in the structure of bacteria. Gram positive cells have large bulky cell walls made out of a substance called peptidoglycan. In contract Gram negative bacteria have two thin cell membranes with a thin peptidoglycan layer between them.

To carry out a Gram stain, the bacteria are first washed in a purple stain called crystal violet followed by iodine. The iodine and crystal violet form large complexes which bind to the cell and turn it purple. The cells are then washed with alcohol which strips outer lipid layers away from the cell. The Gram positive cell looses some of its large chunky peptidoglycan cell wall but keeps enough of it to retain the purple colour. The Gram negative cell has its outer membrane and small peptidoglycan layer completely stripped away, leaving it colourless. The cells are then given a second stain with a compound called safranin. This turns the colourless Gram negative cells pink but is not strong enough to affect the deep purple colour of the Gram positive cells.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This difference in cell wall structure affects far more than just the response to colourful stains. Gram negative cells are more likely to be resistant to antibiotics, but are more susceptible to detergents. Gram positive bacteria produce a large number of exotoxins - harmful substances that are secreted from the bacteria into the environment. Gram negative bacteria have a high lipid content in their outer membrane including the endotoxin LPS which activates strong immune system responses in humans. Unlike the exotoxins, this endotoxin is not released from the bacteria on purpose but can be recognised by the immune system.

There are also some bacteria that are neither Gram positive nor Gram negative, but are known as "Gram-indeterminate". These include strange and wonderful things like mycobacteria (which have a cell wall that resists stain removal) and even bacteria with no cell wall at all!

---

Credit link for image 1

Credit link for image 2

About S.E. Gould

A biochemist with a love of microbiology, the Lab Rat enjoys exploring, reading about and writing about bacteria. Having finally managed to tear herself away from university, she now works for a small company in Cambridge where she turns data into manageable words and awesome graphs.

More by S.E. Gould

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe