In Ancient Bones, an Elephant-Size Surprise

Ancient DNA reshuffles the pachyderm family tree

Straight-tusked

The skull of a straight-tusked elephant. 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Mammoths certainly lived up to their names. They were not only enormous in size, but their fame often overshadows the other elephants that were roaming around during the Pleistocene. Among these Ice Age also-rans were the straight-tusked elephants of Eurasia, known to paleontologists as Palaeoloxodon, and a quartet of these fossils from Germany has just churned up what naturalists thought they knew about elephant evolution.

Up until now, Palaeoloxodon were thought to be close relatives of today’s Asian elephants. In fact, they seemed so similar to each other that some paleontologists considered the extinct straight-tusked elephants to belong to the same genus as the Asian elephant, Elephas. But after analyzing the ancient DNA recovered from four Palaeoloxodon uncovered in Germany – one site 244,000 years old, the other 120,000 years old – paleogeneticist Matthias Meyer and colleagues found a very different signature.

Where the straight-tusked elephant fits into the new family tree. Credit: Meyer et al 2017


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If the skeletal clues had been correct, the mitochondrial genomes of Palaeoloxodon should have compared most closely to today’s Asian elephants. Instead, Meyer and coauthors found that the straight-tusked elephants paleogenome was closest to that of today’s African forest elephant, Loxodonta cyclotis (itself only genetically distinguished from African bush elephants in 2010). This not only shuffles the straight-tusked elephants into a new place on the pachyderm family tree, but it alters what paleontologists thought about the long history of elephants.

The straight-tusked elephant is now an example of convergent evolution, starting from an ancestor that had more in common with African elephants but becoming anatomically more like Asian elephants. That also means that the behemoth branch that led to today’s African elephants – which was always assumed to have been isolated in Africa – actually left the continent and proliferated through Eurasia.

Elephant skeletons can be deceiving. Paleogeneticists had already highlighted this with the discovery that all of North America’s mammoths – previously split into three or four different species – actually interbred with each other and may represent a single, highly-variable species. The unexpected placement of Palaeoloxodonta only highlights how elephant evolution is far more complicated than anyone previously realized. As we race to save the last living elephants from extinction, we’re only just starting to understand the nuances of their evolutionary backstory.

Reference:

Meyer, M., Palkopoulou, E., Baleka, S., Stiller, M., Penkman, K., Alt, K., Ishida, Y., Mania, D., Mallick, S., Meijer, T., Meller, H., Nagel, S., Nickel, B., Ostritz, S., Rohland, N., Schauer, K., Schüler, T., Roca, A., Reich, D., Shapiro, B., Hofreiter, M. 2017. Palaeogenomes of Eurasian straight-tusked elephants challenge the current view of elephant evolution. eLife. doi: 10.7554/eLife.25413

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe