New Proto-Dinosaur Found in Colorado

A lanky reptile found in the Centennial State is a close cousin of early dinosaurs

Kwanasaurus

A restoration of Kwanasaurus.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


What’s almost a dinosaur, but not quite? The answer, as paleontologists have come to understand, is “a silesaur!”, a non-dinosaurian dinosauromorph. I know that’s a bit of a mouthful. Let’s unpack that.

Silesaurs aren’t exactly famous in fossil circles yet. The iconic member of the group, Silesaurus, was named in 2003 and the group’s identity wasn’t fully recognized until 2010. As old as they are, dating back through the Middle and Late parts of the Triassic, they’re pretty new on the Mesozoic block. And they’re important to our understanding of how dinosaurs evolved. Silesaurs are not technically dinosaurs, but they’re close relatives that belong to the larger group which dinosaurs are nested in. That’s why they’re called non-dinosaurian dinosauromorphs – in short, protodinos. And paleontologists Jeffrey Martz and Bryan Small have just named a new one from Colorado.

The new silesaur, known from parts of the skull and body, is named Kwanasauruswilliamparkeri and lived more than 207 million years ago. Its name is a combination of Ute and Greek meaning “eagle lizard,” while the species name honors influential Triassic paleontologist Bill Parker. It’s the fourth silesaur known from North America, and the latest of 11 described so far.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But Kwanasaurus isn’t quite like other silesaurs. The dinosaur’s teeth and jaws, Martz and Small write, seem better-adapted to shearing plants than the more omnivorous lifestyle expected of these animals. Then again, coprolites attributed to silesaurs have been found with beetle pieces in them, and, as Martz and Small note, the dietary flexibility of silesaurs might have allowed for their evolutionary success through the Triassic as they evolved alongside their dinosaur relatives.

There are undoubtedly other silesaurs to find. As it stands now, it seems like silesaurs evolved in the southern part of the supercontinent Pangaea during the Early or Middle part of the Triassic before spreading around the world. They give us a rough picture of what the ancestors of the first dinosaurs were like, yet they thrived alongside the earliest dinosaurs and evolved in their own ways. Ultimately, for reasons that remain unknown, the silesaurs disappeared as their dinosaurian relatives gained greater prominence, but, given their Triassic tenure, they embodied both the past and future of the Age of Reptiles as they strut alongside the “terrible lizards.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe