What a Drag

A rare fossil records a quiet moment of Jurassic time

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Visions of prehistoric life are big on violence and drama. The struggle between predator and prey, as well as fights between rivals, are classic fodder for envisioning the deep past. When we see teeth, claws, spikes, and armor, we can’t but imagine what they were used for. But these savage moments were not the whole of the prehistoric world. An unusual find from Germany is a reminder of calmer Mesozoic moments.

The fossil, described by paleontologist Dean Lomax and colleagues, records a few continuous moments of Jurassic time laid out in limestone. The story is easy to follow. Thin, parallel lines make up most of the fossil, stretching over 28 feet. And at the very end of that drag mark, there rests the shell of the ammonite Subplanites rueppellianus.

The ammonite drag mark. Credit: Lomax et al 2017

If the ammonite had been alive when it left the drag, then this would count as a trace fossil – imprints and other signs of the behavior of living animals. In this case, however, Lomax and colleagues point out that the Subplanites was probably dead when it made the drag. When these ammonites were killed and rapidly buried, they would preserved the hardened lower jaw. In this case, the Subplanites lacked the lower jaw, indicating that it must have fallen out during decay. In fact, the gases produced inside the shell as the cephalopod rotted likely gave it just enough buoyancy to be carried a long way over the ancient seafloor.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Lomax and coauthors conclude their paper by writing that “MCFO 0492 represents the hitherto longest fossil drag mark created by a dead animal, complete with the animal preserved at the end.” It can’t tell us anything about the behavior of Subplanites. But along with other drag, bounce, and roll marks, fossils like these still offer us a window into a lost world. If you were able to dip back into the Jurassic seas and knell on the bottom, but you probably wouldn’t be surrounded by a feeding frenzy. More likely, you’d see an expired ammonite idly drifting by, leaving us a reminder that the fossil record is about more that nature red in tooth and claw.

Reference:

Lomax, D., Falkingham, P., Schweigert, G., Jiménez, A. 2017. An 8.5 m long ammonite drag mark from the Upper Jurassic Solnhofen Lithographic Limestones, Germany. PLOS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175426 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe