Astrobiology Roundup

                      Lots of new scientific results in the past couple of weeks feed directly into the central questions of astrobiology – from the search for life, to the environment of interplanetary and interstellar space, and the grand cosmological terrain we find ourselves in.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


 

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lots of new scientific results in the past couple of weeks feed directly into the central questions of astrobiology - from the search for life, to the environment of interplanetary and interstellar space, and the grand cosmological terrain we find ourselves in.

No Methane For Mars

The latest measurements of atmospheric methane on Mars, made in-situ by the Tunable Laser Spectrometer onboard the Curiosity rover, peg it at less than 1.3 parts per billion. This is in stark contrast to earlier claims, from telescopic studies, of concentrations as high as 45 parts per billion in certain locations, with seasonal variation. Methane could be a key indicator of the metabolic activity of microorganisms, as it is here on Earth. The lack of a detection is not yet definitive proof that earlier measurements were in error, but it certainly calls them into some doubt.

Voyager's Magnetic Puzzle

Now it's clear that Voyager 1 has indeed passed into the interstellar medium, one of the next puzzles is why the configuration of magnetic fields around the spacecraft have not shifted very significantly. The expectation had been for a magnetic change in this transition to the region outside the Sun's electromagnetic dominance. There may be more surprises in store.

Europa Askew

A study of the configuration of the great cracks and creases adorning Jupiter's icy moon Europa suggests that the patterning seen is evidence that the satellite tilts - its spin axis pointing away from a 'straight' up and down orientation by a mere degree or so. This small change could explain the distribution of stresses across Europa's icy crust (due to Jupiter's gravitational tides) - and it could be happening over days and months. It could also tell us something about the longevity of Europa's long speculated interior ocean. A mission to Europa could help resolve this question.

A Vast Galactic Belch

The supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy has long been thought a quiet and relatively diminutive object (a mere 4.3 million times the mass of the Sun). But, in recent years, evidence has been accumulating that it does occasionally tear up passing matter and generate a great outpouring of energy - radiation and fast moving particles. Now another observation could add to these clues - the ethereal glow of radiation from the Magellanic Stream may be an echo of just such an episode some 2 million years ago, one that could have produced the great 'Fermi Bubbles' reported earlier. The impact on our remote backwoods area of the Milky Way might have been small, but we don't know for sure. Across the history of the galaxy such events could have played an influential role in setting the character of the stellar population, and ultimately the environment our solar system formed from.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe