C-SPAN’s ‘After Words’ Discusses Our Cosmic Status

Ever feel that broadcast TV fails to tackle the big issues? I don’t mean the state of the economy, healthcare, the future of clean energy, or what B-list celebrities had for breakfast – I mean the Really Big Issues.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


(A. Fitzsimmons/ESO)

Ever feel that broadcast TV fails to tackle the big issues? I don't mean the state of the economy, healthcare, the future of clean energy, or what B-list celebrities had for breakfast - I mean the Really Big Issues. Like whether or not we're alone in the universe, whether life is somehow special, and whether or not our existence is at all significant in a cosmos filled with billions of trillions of stars and planets.

Well, it's your lucky day. Scientific American Mind editor, and writer of the Streams of Consciousness blog, Ingrid Wickelgren recently sat down with me to discuss my new book The Copernicus Complex. You can now catch the show here, or here, or on YouTube. We covered a lot of ground, from the ideas of Copernican mediocrity, to searching for the chemical fingerprints of life, and even how you can use a chicken to explain Bayesian probability theory (really). Take a look, and enjoy.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe