Merging Black Holes: A Matter of Some Gravity

Two black holes merging can cast off a few percent of their total mass as gravitational waves in just minutes, sending the final object off on a high-speed journey through the universe

(NASA/JPL)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The nature of gravitational waves is, in and of itself, not so very hard to grasp. If you can make the jump to seeing spacetime as a 'something' you can make the jump to imagining that you can warp it and send ripples through it. 

Of course the mathematical physics that describes spacetime's response to mass and energy, the theory of general relativity, is not for the faint of heart. It's beautiful, but it's also an intimidating display of partial differential equations and tensors mathematics. 

This is especially true when we try to describe the most extreme examples of mass, energy, and spacetime - black holes. But that's not all, because nature goes and plays a game of 'catch-me-if-you-can'. In the real universe we don't just have to worry about single black holes (which are tough enough to understand), but also binary black holes that will - in principle - spiral together and merge to make a single, larger, black hole. And they do this by pumping gravitational waves out into the cosmos.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Calculating the details of exactly how that might happen is awfully hard for anything resembling a realistic situation (complete with asymmetries and non-circular orbits). In fact it wasn't really a solved problem until very recently - in the mid-2000's - and it took the heft of numerical physics and advanced computational techniques to finally crack it.

Part of the reason for the challenge is that in a system of merging black holes the very coordinate system that you're trying to work in is changing and is literally being swallowed through the event horizons of the holes. But it's also a consequence of the non-linear nature of Einstein's equations - which greatly complicates things. In more classical physics, such as electromagnetism, Maxwell's linear equations help us readily calculate how, for example, an electron might radiate away energy. But make that radiation of energy a non-linear property and the equations get a lot stickier to solve.

The following movie (Credit: Caltech/Cornell) gives some idea of the nature of the problem.

The bottom line is that theory and computation predict that a binary black hole system will spiral together, radiating away momentum via gravitational waves with increasingly short wavelength (increasing frequency). With a final high frequency, high amplitude 'chirp', the holes can merge inside a highly distorted event horizon that quickly 'rings down' to a more settled state - again by radiating away energy in gravitational waves. It is precisely this set of signatures that an experiment like A-LIGO can look for.

Depending on the geometry of the collision and the spin of the holes, a fraction of the total mass of the original two holes will be lost as gravitational wave energy. So you might start with two holes totaling 100 solar masses, and end up with a hole of perhaps 95 solar masses. That may not sound so impressive, but we're talking about solar masses - a few 1030 kilograms of mass turning into gravitational radiation and being lost to the cosmos in a very short time. In other words, these black hole mergers can briefly be among the most luminous objects in the universe - except their luminosity is not in electromagnetic radiation, but in gravitational radiation.

There's one other little trick up the sleeve of a merging black hole system. If the black holes are asymmetric (with different masses for example) something very peculiar happens. As the holes merge they experience a recoil, and can shoot off across the cosmos. Another way of looking at this is to say that the center of mass of the system - the 'balance point' between the masses - follows a spiral path outwards as the holes spiral inwards. At the end, the whole system - the 'new' black hole - is moving, or recoiling off in some direction. 

Researchers have found that if you add in the spin of the black holes, that recoil velocity could be huge - reaching levels of 4,000 kilometers a second. That's enough to propel the newly formed hole out of any known galaxy, easily exceeding the escape velocity. 

So is the cosmos strewn with high speed black hole merger products? Not necessarily, the final recoil velocity depends a lot on details of how the two holes' spin was aligned and the difference in mass of the holes - and can be a lot less. But the truth is we don't know the full story yet about any of this, and that's why the quest to detect gravitational waves is so exciting.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe