Pebbles, Oceans and Wasp Clocks

There are many ways to gauge planetary change

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Pebble Atmospheres

The loss of atmospheric components over time is a major issue for rocky planets, especially those that might be capable of harboring life. Earth does it slowly, a world like Mars has done it faster. A new study by Howe et al. in the Astrophysical Journal digs into the details of a slightly different scenario: Atmospheric loss for young Earth-analog worlds with initially massive atmospheres (dominated by molecular hydrogen and helium), formed out of a so-called "pebble-accretion" mechanism. They examine loss by mechanisms like Jeans escape, hydrodynamic escape, stellar winds, impact erosion, photoionization and photodissociation. Intriguingly, photodissociation by lower energy ultraviolet light (the splitting of molecules that allows lighter elements to escape to space) seems like it could account for 90% of atmospheric loss, with impact erosion (from asteroid collisions) amounting to around 5%. The catch is that these worlds don't lose much atmosphere. It seems hard to explain how pebble accreted worlds could ever lose enough of their primordial ingredients to wind up looking like the Earth.

Ocean Energy


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What happens to a terrestrial planet's oceans when the planet heats up? Global warming on Earth is, unfortunately, providing a set of answers. A new statistical study by Hu et al. in Science Advances uses three decades of data, together with computer modeling to probe water circulation, finding that the kinetic energy of major currents in Earth's oceans has grown by some 15% per decade. Much of this could be driven by the documented increase in ocean wind energies. But exactly what is going on is still unclear - changing patterns of circulation could also contribute to the way measurements are shifting, and what is seen is a trend on top of a range of variations. Nonetheless, from a physics standpoint it all makes sense - rising temperatures in a system must end up manifested in the energetics of that system. 

Wasp Clocks

Some 12,000 years ago there was another period of rising sea-level on Earth, as it emerged from an ice-age. As it happened certain northern coastal areas in Australia were inundated, disrupting the human societies there. Now a remarkably ingenious technique for dating ancient rock art in the region has been used to show that a unique style of artwork - with slender human figures called Gwions - coincides with that period. This artwork doesn't use charcoal, which would otherwise provide carbon for radioisotope dating. But researchers have discovered that wasps built nests of mud on the cave walls - before they were painted, and afterwards.  The wasps also incorporated particles of carbon from the environment into their sticky mud constructions. Dating that carbon provides a 'before and after' range of times for the paintings themselves. That range sits right on 12,000 years ago and suggests that the unusual art could have been influenced by disrupted environments and cultural dynamics as the world around the artists was transformed.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe