Protocells, Bombardment, Martian Erosion and Biofluorescence

What do these things have in common? They’re all important for astrobiology

C. Scharf 2019

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Protocells

Whatever else transpired at the time of life’s recognizable origins on Earth it seems likely that a critical step was the formation of cells – membrane enclosures – in which more complex molecules could congregate at concentrations high enough for interesting chemistry to take place. But there’s a catch: salty, ion-filled ocean water and ionic magnesium and iron, present in compounds like RNA, all act to destroy the fatty-acid spheres that we think could have been the first proto-cells. A new study by Cornell et al. offers a plausible and neat solution. It appears that if amino acids are simply thrown into the mix they can not only protect the fatty-acid layers from being destroyed, they can trigger structural changes that include the formation of multi-layer cell walls, much more similar to modern animal cells. There’s a way to go to before we understand this better, but it’s one of the most promising discoveries to come along so far.

Bombardment


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


There’s little doubt that the very young solar system, 4.5 billion years ago, was a rather chaotic place. In order to explain the present architecture of the major planets a certain amount of orbital rearrangement, or migration, is often invoked. This is also motivated because it helps explain evidence for a period of intense asteroid bombardment (the Late Heavy Bombardment) that has been thought to occur about 3.9 billion years ago. But some of that evidence, in massive cratering on the Moon, is tricky to interpret due to limited statistics. Now a new study by Mojzsis et al. using modeling and data from meteorites proposes an earlier timeline. In this scenario the giant planets underwent orbital shifts around 4.48 billion years ago, triggering a period of bombardment on worlds like the Earth. Intriguingly, by shifting this tumult to an earlier time the Earth might have been a calmer place for life to get going some 4.4 billion years ago, about half a billion years earlier than commonly assumed.

Martian Erosion

The seemingly sporadic presence of atmospheric methane on Mars, confined to certain locations and altitudes is a subject of intense ongoing study and speculation. Could it be due to methane-producing life, or is it geological in origin? In either case, just figuring out exactly how it’s being released from somewhere on the surface is a key step. A new study by Safi et al. looks at the possibility of wind erosion releasing methane trapped in rocks. It turns out that unless there is methane trapped in deposits rivaling the richest hydrocarbon shale on Earth it’s extremely unlikely for erosion to be producing the pulses of gas detected by instruments like those onboard the Curiosity rover. That’s an extremely important negative result, helping to further narrow the options and allowing us to home in on the truth.

Biofluorescence

Add a new trick to the toolbox used for seeking life elsewhere in the universe. On Earth some ocean corals reprocess damaging ultraviolet light into visible wavelengths, fluorescing with spooky but beautiful red, orange, or green light. Not to be confused with bioluminescence – biofluorescence UV conversion doesn’t involve chemical reactions or the organisms generating their own light, they’re simply juggling the UV photons like hot potatoes until they can ‘cool’ them off. A new study by O’Malley-James and Kaltenegger asks how this kind of mechanism might play out on other worlds, particularly on rocky exoplanets closely orbiting low-mass M-dwarf stars known for their tendency to emit strong flares of UV-light. Remarkably, for a planet covered in biofluorescent life, in the right conditions an incoming flare of ultraviolet radiation could cause a glow response that would temporarily increase the visible light coming from the planet by up to a factor of a hundred. It’s a temporal biosignature that just might be detectable by a new generation of giant telescopes.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe