Rock-Eating Martian Microbes?

A recently published study of a 30-pound martian meteorite found in Antarctica suggests the presence of indigenous carbon-rich material, ancient water erosion, and a number of tiny structures that resemble the sort of features that we see rock-eating microbes leaving in basaltic glasses here on Earth.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A recently published study of a 30-pound martian meteorite found in Antarctica suggests the presence of indigenous carbon-rich material, ancient water erosion, and a number of tiny structures that resemble the sort of features that we see rock-eating microbes leaving in basaltic glasses here on Earth.

This rock, Yamato 000593, appears to have formed 1.3 billion years ago from martian lava. About 12 million years ago it got blasted from the surface of Mars as part of the spall from an asteroid impact, before winding up falling to Earth's surface as a meteorite some 50,000 years ago.

Perhaps the most intriguing data from the study is this image of a thin, polished section of the interior of the meteorite:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


(Credit: White et al. 2014, Astrobiology Journal, NASA/JPL)

These tubule and microtubule-like structures emanating from a mineral vein strongly resemble structures in material taken from places like the side of Mauna Loa and oceanic crust on Earth. Previous analyses of these Earthly samples have attributed the features to so-called 'autolithotrophic' organisms - microbes that eat raw inorganic material, seeking out elements like iron or manganese in particular to drive their metabolism.

(Microbe eating paths? Credit: Scripps Institution of Oceanography)

This example (2nd figure) shows the microscopic tunnels that terrestrial microbes appear to have bored in a piece of volcanic glass. Fissures allow the organisms to be carried into the rock by water, but once there they can cause their own bio-erosion. The form of these tunnels is not the same as those known to be caused by water reacting with the minerals, and DNA traces have been retrieved from these sites.

So what's happening in Yamato 000593? The authors use a decent amount of caution, but do claim to find - in addition to carbon-rich (but not carbonate) enhancements along tunnel walls - a number of nano-meter to micro-meter scale carbon-rich spherules, structures seen also in a famous martian meteorite called Nakhla - as well as the curious microtunnels or tubules.

It's certainly intriguing, although fingers have been burnt before, with bolder claims of micro-fossils in martian meteorites back in 1996 that didn't pan out (a study that included authors from the present one). One thing is certain, whatever processes have been at play in Yamato 000593 are worth understanding. If they turn out to be non-biological we'll still learn more about Mars. If they turn out to be the result of terrestrial bio-contamination (a possibility that's hard to rule out at this stage), we'll - rather ironically - learn how Earth organisms could get a foothold on Mars!

And of course, it is possible that these really are the ancient signatures of life on another world...

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe