The Copernicus Complex: A Primer

In a month’s time, the end result of two-and-a-half years of research, thinking, writing, re-writing, re-re-writing, editing, mulling, puzzling, coffee-drinking, beer-swilling, swearing, and tweaking will hit the shelves in the form of my new book The Copernicus Complex.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In a month's time, the end result of two-and-a-half years of research, thinking, writing, re-writing, re-re-writing, editing, mulling, puzzling, coffee-drinking, beer-swilling, swearing, and tweaking will hit the shelves in the form of my new book The Copernicus Complex. In the coming weeks I'll be writing some special pieces here at Life, Unbounded, exploring some of what I learned, and expanding on some of the scientific tales in the book. This month's print edition of Sci Am is also carrying an excerpt from the book - but that's just a taster, without too many punchlines (sorry, frustrated commentators).

So what's it all about? At the simplest level it's about the quest to find out whether there's other life in the universe. But what I discovered during the past two years is that there's nothing simple about that quest at all (I know, but I am a simple soul). Not only did I have to dig into the science of stars, planets, nebulae, cosmology, atoms, molecules, non-linear dynamics, gravitation, geophysics, molecular biology, microbiology, genetics, evolution, space travel, microscopy, probability, statistics, paleoclimate, and chemistry, I also realized that I had to tackle the problems of mathematical bias, inference, and viewpoint that bedevil efforts to generalize what we know about the nature of existence.

As someone more akin to the dressing-gown-wearing, tea-sipping, befuddled Arthur Dent in Douglas Adams' Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, than to its pan-dimensional, hyper-intelligent beings, it was therapeutic and helpful to construct the following tasteful infographic (click to expand) to explain what the heck I was doing all this time. I thought I would share it here.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For use in case of existential confusion.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe